|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COUNCIL AGENDA - CITY OF BURBANK
TUESDAY, JUNE 20, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This
agenda contains a summary of each item of business which the Council may
discuss or act on at this meeting. The
complete staff report and all other written documentation relating to each
item on this agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and the
reference desks at the three libraries and are available for public
inspection and review. If you have any question about any matter on the
agenda, please call the office of the City Clerk at (818) 238-5851.
This facility is disabled accessible.
Auxiliary aids and services are available for individuals with
speech, vision or hearing impairments (48-hour notice is required).
Please contact the ADA Coordinator at (818) 238-5021 voice or (818)
238-5035 TDD with questions or concerns.
CLOSED
SESSION ORAL COMMUNICATIONS IN COUNCIL CHAMBER: Comments
by the public on Closed Session items only.
These comments will be limited to three
minutes.
For
this segment, a PINK card must be
completed and presented to the City Clerk.
CLOSED
SESSION IN CITY HALL BASEMENT LUNCH ROOM/CONFERENCE ROOM:
a.
Conference with Legal Counsel � Existing Litigation:
b.
Conference with Labor Negotiator:
INVOCATION:
The Courts have concluded that sectarian prayer as part of City Council meetings is not permitted under the Constitution.
FLAG
SALUTE:
ROLL
CALL:
RECOGNITION: GIRLS BASKETBALL TEAMS.
PROCLAMATION:
CHILDHOOD CANCER AWARENESS WEEK.
PRESENTATION: 2007 ROSE PARADE FLOAT RENDERING.
COUNCIL
COMMENTS:
(Including reporting on Council Committee Assignments)
INTRODUCTION
OF ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS: At
this time additional items to be considered at this meeting may be
introduced. As a general rule,
the Council may not take action on any item which does not appear on this
agenda. However, the Council may
act if an emergency situation exists or if the Council finds that a need to
take action arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda.
Govt. Code �54954.2(b).
1.
AIRPORT AUTHORITY COMMISSIONER REPORT:
At
the request of the
The
main focus of this report will be issues which were on the Airport Authority
meeting agenda of
Recommendation:
6:30
P.M. PUBLIC HEARING:
2.
ORDERING THE FORMATION OF OLIVE AVENUE
UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 AND THE REMOVAL OF ALL POLES, OVERHEAD
WIRES AND ASSOCIATED OVERHEAD STRUCTURES LOCATED THEREIN:
Staff is requesting the
Council adopt a resolution ordering formation of the Olive Avenue
Underground Utility District No. 1 (UUD No.1) and the removal of all poles,
overhead wires and associated overhead structures located therein
The Council has directed staff to: leverage
its $360,000 per year within the Burbank Water and Power (BWP) budget for
aesthetically-driven undergrounding; identify view corridors along major
streets where undergrounding would have maximum impact; and, use the
mechanism of UUDs so that other utilities must underground their lines when
the City undergrounds its utilities� overhead lines. Staff has
identified two street segments where undergrounding would have a strong
visual impact: Olive Avenue, including curbs and sidewalks, from 30
feet west of the Western Flood Control Channel (near Flower Street) to 30
feet west of Victory Boulevard; and, Lake Street, including curbs and
sidewalks, from 20 feet south of Olive Avenue to Magnolia Boulevard.
On May 30, 2006, the
Council adopted Resolution No. 27,250, which approved the Map and Report of
the Public Works Director for proposed UUD No. 1; and, Resolution No.
27,251, which gave notice of its intention to create and form UUD No. 1,
directed that required notices be posted and published, and set a Public
Hearing for June 20, 2006.
The City and three
communications utilities, AT&T, Charter Communications and Verizon, will
be undergrounding their lines within UUD No.1. The
utilities agreed to use joint trenching to reduce construction costs and to
seek competitive bids for the substructure installation (duct banks, pull
boxes, maintenance vaults) under the City�s purchasing rules and
procedures. Also, each utility
would do its own cable and customer connection work at its own expense; and,
remove its own overhead conductors and related facilities, except that BWP
would remove any jointly-owned poles.
BWP and the utilities also agreed to divide the undergrounding work into two phases that span a total of three years (June 20, 2006 to May 30, 2009): Phase 1 would include all street segments except Lake Street north of Orange Grove Avenue; and, Phase 2 would be along Lake Street from Orange Grove Avenue to Magnolia Boulevard, and would include any underground work in Magnolia Boulevard itself. This phased approach would spread the cost over the next three Fiscal Years (2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09) and would allow BWP to better coordinate UUD No. 1 undergrounding activities with its station construction activities.
The estimated costs for Phase 1 and Phase 2, from detail design through street restoration and removal of overhead facilities, breakdown by utility as follows:
Because the extent of joint trenching is yet to be determined, current cost estimates do not reflect joint trenching.
Staff finds that: forming
UUD No. 1 would not have an adverse impact on BWP (Fund 496). The
electrical undergrounding work would be funded within BWP�s existing
funding for aesthetic undergrounding, supplemented by previously-identified
capital improvement activities;
Forming UUD No. 1 would not have an adverse impact on
the City�s Street Lighting Fund (Fund 129). The street lighting
undergrounding work would be funded within the existing funding for street
lighting;
Forming UUD No. 1 would not have an adverse impact on the General Fund,
including the Public Works Department. The
affected utilities would bear the costs of street restoration because the
affected street segments were not scheduled for resurfacing;
Forming UUD No. 1 would have minimal adverse impact
on directly-affected customers, as they would not have to bear the costs of
conversion to underground service; and,
Forming UUD No. 1 enables the City to leverage BWP�s planned capital
improvement activities into an opportunity to beautify highly-visible
segments of the
Recommendation:
REPORTING
ON CLOSED SESSION:
INITIAL
OPEN PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
(Two minutes on any matter concerning City Business.)
There are four segments of Oral Communications during the Council Meeting. The first precedes the Closed Session items, the second and third segments precede the main part of the City Council�s business (but follow announcements and public hearings), and the fourth is at the end of the meeting following all other City business.
Closed
Session Oral Communications.
During this period of oral communications, the public may comment
only on items listed on the Closed Session Agenda(s).
A PINK card must be completed and presented to the City Clerk.
Comments will be limited to three
minutes.
Initial
Open Public Comment Period of Oral Communications.
During this period of Oral Communications, the public may comment on
any matter concerning City Business.
A BLUE card must be
completed and presented to the City Clerk.
NOTE: Any person speaking
during this segment may not speak during the third period of Oral
Communications. Comments will be limited to two minutes.
Agenda
Item Oral Communications.
This segment of Oral Communications immediately follows the first
period, but is limited to comments on action items on the agenda for this
meeting. For this segment, a YELLOW
card must be completed and presented to the City Clerk. Comments will be
limited to four minutes.
Final
Open Public Comment Period of Oral Communications.
This segment of oral communications follows the conclusion of agenda
items at the end of the meeting. The
public may comment at this time on any matter concerning City Business.
NOTE: Any member of the
public speaking at the Initial Open Public Comment Period of Oral
Communications may not speak during this segment.
For this segment, a GREEN
card must be completed and presented to the City Clerk.
Comments will be limited to two
minutes.
City
Business.
City business is defined as any matter that is under the jurisdiction
of the City Council. Although
other topics may be of interest to some people, if those topics are not
under City Council jurisdiction, they are
Videotapes/Audiotapes.
Videotapes or audiotapes may be presented by any member of the public
at any period of Oral Communications or at any public hearing.
Such tapes may not exceed the time limit of the applicable Oral
Communications period or any public comment period during a public hearing.
The playing time for the tape shall be counted as part of the allowed
speaking time of that member of the public during that period.
Videotapes
must be delivered to the Public Information Office by no later than
Printed
on the videocassette cover should be the name of the speaker, the period of
oral communication the tape is to be played, and the total running time of
the segment. The Public
Information Office is not responsible for �cueing up� tapes, rewinding
tapes, or fast forwarding tapes. To
prevent errors, there should be ten seconds of blank tape at the beginning
and end of the segment to be played. Additionally,
the speaker should provide the first sentence on the tape as the �in
cue� and the last sentence as the �out cue�.
As
with all Oral Communications, videotapes and audiotapes are limited to the
subject matter jurisdiction of the City and may be declared out of order by
the Mayor.
Disruptive Conduct. The Council requests that you observe the order and decorum of our Council Chamber by turning off or setting to vibrate all cellular telephones and pagers, and that you refrain from making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks. Boisterous and disruptive behavior while the Council is in session, and the display of signs in a manner which violates the rights of others or prevents others from watching or fully participating in the Council meeting, is a violation of our Municipal Code and any person who engages in such conduct can be ordered to leave the Council Chamber by the Mayor.
Once
an individual is requested to leave the Council Chamber by the Mayor, that
individual may not return to the Council Chamber for the remainder of the
meeting. BMC �2-216(b).
Individuals
standing in the Council Chamber will be required to take a seat.
Also, no materials shall be placed in the aisles in order to keep the
aisles open and passable. BMC �2-217(b). Your
participation in City Council meetings is welcome and your courtesy will be
appreciated.
COUNCIL
AND STAFF RESPONSE TO OPEN PUBLIC COMMENT AND AGENDA ITEM PERIOD OF ORAL
COMMUNICATIONS:
AGENDA
ITEM ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
(Four minutes on Action Agenda items only.)
COUNCIL
AND STAFF RESPONSE TO AGENDA ITEM ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
JOINT
MEETING WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, HOUSING AUTHORITY, PARKING AUTHORITY
AND YOUTH ENDOWMENT SERVICES FUND BOARD:
3.
ADOPTION
OF FISCAL YEAR 2006-07 ANNUAL BUDGET, CITYWIDE FEE SCHEDULE AND APPROPRIATIONS
LIMIT:
The
purpose of this report is to request that the Council, Redevelopment Agency
Board, Housing Authority, Parking Authority and Youth Endowment Services (YES)
Fund Board adopt the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006-07 Citywide Budget, Citywide Fee
Schedule and Appropriations Limit.
On
Budget
Study Sessions were held on May 2, May 9, May 16, May 23 and
Notable
changes made to the Proposed Budget by the Council during the study sessions
and the Public Hearing affecting recurring expenditures included restoring two
frozen police officer positions, adding two police cadet positions, a forensic
specialist and a kennel attendant, Citywide training, and ramping up for an
enhanced Burbank Bus circulator. The
Council also agreed to set aside an additional $1 million for infrastructure
maintenance and repairs. The
following chart provides a Citywide snapshot of the resources and
appropriations for FY 2006-07:
The
changes directed by the Council at the Public Hearing on Recommendation:
2.
(4/5 vote
required)
3.
A RESOLUTION
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Adoption of proposed Redevelopment Agency resolution entitled:
Adoption of proposed Housing Authority resolution entitled:
Adoption of proposed Parking Authority resolution entitled:
Adoption of proposed Youth Endowment Services Fund Board
resolution entitled:
RECESS
the Red
JOINT
MEETING WITH THE PARKING AUTHORITY:
4.
Property-based
In
September 2004, staff presented the Magnolia Park Action Plan (Action Plan)
that included the results from five survey groups, a 3,000-resident survey and
input from the Magnolia Park Community Advisory Committee. The Action Plan
findings recommended numerous improvements and programs such as retail
leasing, parking, promotions and events, and other miscellaneous improvements.
These various activities were recommended to be funded by a proposed
Property-Based Business Improvement District (P-BID).
A
Steering Committee (Committee) was subsequently formed to work with staff and
Downtown Resources to develop the Magnolia Park Management District Plan. The
Committee met monthly and numerous property owner meetings were conducted to
develop a draft management plan. Three public, large-group meetings were
conducted with property owners to share the draft plan and receive feedback.
A
final District Plan was made available to the property owners as well as a
bullet point brochure outlining the improvements in the plan. Two public
meetings were held in the petition drive. In addition, a letter with the
accompanying petition was sent to the property owners on two occasions.
Property
owners representing more than 50 percent of the proposed assessment have
signed a petition to initiate the special assessment proceedings.
The
proposed P-BID annual budget is as follows:
Parking
Improvements
$ 67,500 Maintenance
$ 57,500 Promotion,
Advertising, Events and Business Recruitment
$ 55,000 Advocacy
and Administration
$ 65,000 Contingency
Reserve
$ 5,000 Total
$250,000
A
comprehensive strategy for improvements for the
Recommendation:
Adoption
of proposed Council resolution entitled: A
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK TO FORM THE
MAGNOLIA PARK PROPERTY AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE
PROPERTY AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LAW OF 1994.
A
RESOLUTION OF THE PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BURBANK AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF A MAGNOLIA PARK PROPERTY AND BUSINESS
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE PROPERTY AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT LAW OF 1994.
5.
MINUTES:
Approval
of minutes for the adjourned meeting of
Recommendation:
Approve
as submitted.
6.
AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF
Staff is
requesting Council approval to apply for a California Integrated Waste
Management Board (CIWMB) Used Oil Recycling Block Grant for Fiscal Years (FY)
2006-07 through 2011-12. Used oil recycling block grant funds are intended
for the collection of used oil and oil filters.
The Burbank Recycle Center (BRC) has been collecting used motor oil for
recycling since 1982. Last year,
approximately 18,000 gallons of used motor oil and over 10 tons of oil filters
were collected for recycling. Eligibility is contingent upon meeting certain
CIWMB requirements such as hours of operation, notification to the public of
its used oil collection/recycling program, oil filter recycling, advertising
and public education.
State
funding for the City's used oil collection/recycling program benefits the
The
CIWMB requires that applications be received by Recommendation:
Adoption
of proposed resolution entitled: A
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
Staff is requesting authorization to continue
an agreement with the Los Angeles County Probation Department to provide a
contract probation officer as part of the Prevention and Intervention Program
(PIP) for the City of
The
annual cost of this program is approximately $120,000 and is split between the
City and the
Adoption of proposed resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK APPROVING THE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURBANK AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO PROVIDE
A PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION PROGRAM (PIP).
REPORTS
TO COUNCIL:
8.
CAMPAIGNING DURING ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
Council
Member Ramos has requested that the Council consider restricting the use of
Council oral communications periods for certain types of political
campaigning. In the staff report, staff has furnished a compilation of
information that has been provided to the Council in past years.
Pursuant to the Council�s policy staff has done no further work on this
issue.
This
matter brings into apparent opposition two significant public policy issues: the
right of the public to address their elected officials and the right of the
public to not have public funds be expended for or against a candidate or
ballot measure. In addition, the necessity of the elected Council to be
able to direct its efforts toward the business of the City must also be
considered.
Recommendation:
Should
there be majority support on the Council to consider such a restriction, it is
recommended that staff be directed to further research this issue and bring
back a proposal for discussion by the Council.
Staff
requests Council approval to amend the Burbank Municipal Code, Chapter 2,
Section 2-422 to change the composition of the Art in Public Places Committee
by increasing the number of at-large members.
As currently structured, the Art in Public Places Committee is comprised of five members. The membership consists of a Park, Recreation and Community Services Board member; a Planning Board member; and, three members at large appointed by the Council. All Council appointments are for four-year terms and expire on a rotational basis.
At
the There
is no fiscal impact as a result of the recommended action.
Recommendation:
Introduction
of proposed ordinance entitled: AN
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RECONVENE
to the Redevelopment Agency, Housing Authority, Parking Authority and Youth
Endowment Services Fund Board meetings for public comment.
FINAL
OPEN PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
(Two minutes on any matter concerning the business of the City.)
This
is the time for the Final Open Public Comment Period of Oral Communications.
Each speaker will be allowed a maximum of TWO
minutes and may speak on any matter concerning the business of the City.
However, any speaker that spoke during the Initial Open Public Comment
Period of Oral Communications may not speak during the Final Open Public
Comment Period of Oral Communications.
For
this segment, a GREEN card must be
completed, indicating the matter to be discussed, and presented to the City
Clerk.
COUNCIL
AND STAFF RESPONSE TO THE FINAL OPEN PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD OF ORAL
COMMUNICATIONS:
ADJOURNMENT.
To
For
a copy of the agenda and related staff reports, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|