A
regular meeting of the Burbank Redevelopment Agency was held in the City of
Burbank Council Chamber, 275 East Olive Avenue, on the above date. The
meeting was called to order at 5:06 p.m. by Mr. Laurell, Chairman.
CLOSED SESSION
Present- - - - -
Absent - - - - -
Also Present - |
Members Golonski, Murphy, Vander Borght and Laurell.
Member Ramos.
Ms. Alvord, Interim City Manager; Mr. Barlow, City Attorney; Mrs. Georgino,
Assistant Executive Director; and, Mrs. Campos, Secretary.
|
5:06 P.M.
Recess |
The Agency recessed at this time to the City Hall Basement Lunch
Room/Conference Room to hold a Closed Session on the following:
a.
Conference with Real Property Negotiator:
Pursuant to Govt. Code �54956.8
Agency Negotiator:
Assistant Executive Director/Susan M. Georgino.
Property:
250 East Olive Avenue, corner �parcel� (120� X 310�) at Olive Avenue and
Third Street.
Party With Whom Agency is Negotiating:
Michael Cusumano � Cusumano Real Estate Group.
Terms Under Negotiation:
Potential sale of Agency property.
b.
Conference with Real Property Negotiator:
Pursuant to Govt. Code �54956.8
Agency Negotiator:
Assistant Executive Director/Susan M. Georgino.
Property:
201 East Magnolia Boulevard � Media City Mall (41 acre site generally
bounded by Magnolia Boulevard, I-5 Freeway, Burbank Boulevard and Third
Street).
Party With Whom Agency is Negotiating:
Crown Realty and Development Corporation.
Terms Under Negotiation:
Amendment of Ground Lease and Disposition and Development Agreement.
|
Regular Meeting
Reconvened in
Council
Chambers |
The regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Burbank was
reconvened at 6:43 p.m. by Mr. Laurell, Chairman.
|
Invocation |
The invocation was given by Pastor Ron White, American Lutheran Church.
|
Flag
Salute |
The pledge of allegiance to the flag was led by Susanna Mktrchyan.
|
ROLL CALL
Present- - - - - -
Absent - - - - - -
Also Present - - |
Members Golonski, Murphy, Vander Borght and Laurell.
Member Ramos.
Ms. Alvord, Interim City Manager; Mr. Barlow, City Attorney; Mrs. Georgino,
Assistant Executive Director; and, Mrs. Campos, Secretary.
|
7:02 P.M.
Jt. Public Hrg.
w/Council
RA 62-1
Opportunity Site
No. 2 (Old Police
Block) Burbank
Civic Plaza �
Cusumano Real
Estate Group |
Commissioner Laurell stated that �this is the time and place for the joint
public hearing of the Redevelopment Agency and the Council of the City of
Burbank regarding the Burbank Civic Plaza project located on the southwest
corner of Olive Avenue and Third Street, Burbank, California. The
Applicant is Burbank Civic Plaza LLC. The various components of this
project are a Disposition and Development Agreement; a rezoning to the
Planned Development No. 2002-3 zone to allow for an office building and
ground floor retail/restaurant/commercial space; a Development Agreement
related thereto; a Cooperation Agreement between the City and
Redevelopment Agency relating to the Courthouse Parking Facility; and a
Parking Lease between the Agency and Burbank Civic Plaza LLC.�
|
Notice
Given |
The secretary was asked if notices had been given as required by law. She
replied in the affirmative and advised that no written communications had
been received.
|
Staff
Report |
Ms. Davidson-Guerra,
Senior Redevelopment Project Manager, presented an overview of Opportunity
Site No. 2 bound by Olive Avenue, Third Street, Angeleno Avenue and San
Fernando Boulevard, noting it is a key development site in the downtown.
She stated the Redevelopment Agency (Agency) has been working towards the
redevelopment of this site since 1997 when the first request for
development proposals was circulated resulting in the approval of the
Burbank Village Walk project. She added the Burbank Civic Plaza project,
proposed by the Cusumano Real Estate Group, included an office building
and restaurant/retail uses situated on the corner of Olive Avenue and
Third Street.
With a visual aid,
Mrs. Forbes presented the project entitlements, noting the set-backs,
parking structures, pedestrian walk-way, caf� area, side walks and the
features of the office building that complement City Hall. She stated the
proposed project met the design criteria of the Burbank General Plan, and
the mixed-use development envisioned for the site. She added the
Mitigated Negative Declaration satisfied the environmental review for the
project and no additional review was necessary. She also stated the
project was presented to the Planning Board on February 10, 2003 and
received unanimous approval with conditions to review and approve the
architectural materials and landscaping before building permits were
issued. She noted staff concurred with the Planning Board for a review
process but believed the final approval should be the responsibility of
the Community Development and Park, Recreation and Community Services
Directors.
Ms. Davidson-Guerra
stated because the proposed project required the Agency to sell property
to the developer, a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) was
negotiated for the purpose of documenting the real estate transaction and
the roles and responsibilities of the developer and the Agency. She
discussed the responsibilities of the developer and Agency, and
highlighted the provisions in the parking lease.
She reported the
fiscal impact of the proposed project totals over $4 million for site
assembly, site preparation and proposed offsite improvements. She added
the project would generate public revenues including land sale proceeds,
parking lease revenues and tax increment revenues, with total revenues of
$7.5 million in nominal terms and $2.4 million in present value terms.
She noted when combining the projected net revenues of the project with
the Burbank Village Walk project revenues, the Agency would break even.
With regard to the
project schedule, she reported ground breaking was scheduled for late fall
2003 followed by an 18 month construction period with completion in
mid-2005. She added the fiscal impact of moving forward with the entire
site was balanced with the benefits of completing one of downtown�s key
development sites. She noted the approval of the Burbank Civic Plaza
project coupled with the approved Burbank Village Walk project would
implement the City and Agency�s vision for the site. She added the
complementary components of the two projects would provide a seamless
transition from the Downtown Village to the Civic District and an
additional daytime population that would support the downtown restaurants,
shops, services and existing Agency investments.
|
Applicant |
Michael Cusumano,
Principal with the Cusumano Real Estate Group, began by identifying
projects developed and completed by the Cusumano Real Estate Group, noting
that developer experience and credibility are key in developing large
mixed-use projects. The projects included the Cusumano Office Building
with the BJ�s Restaurant, the Washington Mutual- Elephant Bar Restaurant
Project, a 200,000 square foot office complex in the City of Thousand
Oaks, and a 70, 000 square foot office complex in the Irvine Business
Center, Orange County.
He then discussed
the different components of the proposed Burbank Civic Plaza project,
noting the architectural theme that complemented City Hall.
Brian Ariel,
Architect, discussed the architectural design, noting the significance of
the City Hall building and the developer�s goal to complement features of
the City Hall building and commented on the mixed-use nature of the
project.
Robert Curley,
Landscape Architect, discussed the landscape design and its compatibility
to the street and the Civic Center patterns. He noted the outdoor sitting
areas, trees, walkway, cascading fountain, soft streetscape, and the
landscape buffers.
|
Citizen
Comment |
Appearing to comment were
Esther Espinoza,
inquiring as to the reason the Cusumano Real Estate Group was constantly
being awarded City projects, objecting to the purchase price, requesting
the opportunity to pay the ad valorem taxes on the property, addressing
the ethnicity of future employees of the subcontractors; Dr. Theresa Karam,
objecting to the purchase price, especially due to the difficult state of
the economy, making a counter-offer, objecting to Mr. Golonski�s concern
with the landscaping of the project, inquiring whether Mr. Vander Borght
and Mayor Laurell will be supporting the project; David Piroli, inquiring
as to the actual demand for office space, objecting to the financing plan
of the project in light of the state of the economy, commenting on
interference with the free market system and the sale price of the
property, objecting to the terms of the parking lease; Mike Nolan,
objecting to the purchase price noting the City purchased the property for
over $4 million, stating the purchase price should be over $3 million,
objecting to the terms of the parking lease, insisting that the developer
be required to build appropriate Code-mandated parking; C.L. Stack, in
opposition to the project, objecting to the purchase price, requesting
other developers be given the opportunity to bid for the project; Ron
Vanderford, in opposition to the project, specifically the purchase price,
the terms of the parking lease, commenting on various past projects where
land was given to the developers for nominal prices; and James Schad, in
opposition to the project, specifically the purchase price.
|
Applicant |
In rebuttal, Mr.
Cusumano stated the project was open to developers for the past seven
years. He noted a number of developers had expressed interest in the
site, negotiated similar financing, but were unable to follow through with
the commitment. He also added there was no other developer willing to
move forward with the project, that it was not economically viable for the
land to be left vacant, and noted the fact that the site would house their
corporate offices.
Ms. Davidson-Guerra
responded to public comment regarding demand for office space, the
proposed parking lease, the claim that the site was never marketed, and
the fair reuse value of $100 as the proposed sale price of the property.
She stated the site was actively marketed since 1997, noting the recent
circulation went out to more than 450 real estate development
professionals; the 200 spaces in the Courthouse parking structure were
funded by the Agency for the purpose of facilitating future development on
the Courthouse block or the proposed site, and reaffirmed the need for
office space.
Mr. Hollis, Managing
Principal of Kaiser Marston and Associates, stated Redevelopment law
required the Agency to make a finding that the property is being sold at a
fair reuse value, by looking at the uses and conditions placed on the
property. He noted the few office space developments in Burbank and the
neighboring cities of Glendale and Pasadena, and that the former
developers did not move forward with the project because of the failure to
meet the 11 percent return rate without a land contribution, in addition
to a substantial cash contribution. He stated the Agency�s options
included changing the land-use to allow a residential development that
could yield approximately $800,000; develop a lower density retail use
that would generate approximately $300,000; or do nothing and hope
conditions would improve in the near future. He affirmed the
appropriateness of the transaction for the proposed land use.
|
Hearing
Closed |
There being no further response to the Mayor�s invitation for oral
comment, the hearing was declared closed.
|
City Council
Reso. Adopted |
City Council Resolution No. 26,442 Approving Terms and Provisions and
Authorizing the Execution of a Cooperation Agreement Between the City and
the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Burbank and Consenting to the Sale
of Property (Burbank Civic Plaza) was adopted.
|
City Council
Ord. Read |
City Council Ordinance Approving Planned Development No. 2002-3 and a
Development Agreement Related Thereto (Burbank Civic Plaza, L.L.C.,
Applicant) was read and passed to the second reading.
|
Motion |
It was moved by Ms. Murphy and seconded by Mr. Golonski that �the
following resolution be passed and adopted.�
|
RA 62-1
DDA & Parking
Lease Agrmt w/
Burbank Civic
Plaza LLC &
Coop. Agrmt. w/
City Relating to
Courthouse Pkg.
Facility |
RESOLUTION NO. R-2057:
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF BURBANK APPROVING
THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSITION AND
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND A PARKING LEASE BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND BURBANK
CIVIC PLAZA LLC; AND APPROVING THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS AND AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION OF A COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURBANK AND
THE AGENCY RELATING TO THE COURTHOUSE PARKING FACILITY (BURBANK CIVIC
PLAZA).
|
Adopted |
The resolution was passed by the following vote:
Ayes: Members Golonski, Murphy, Vander Borght and Laurell.
Noes: Members None.
Absent: Member Ramos.
|
8:45 P.M.
Recess |
The Agency recessed at this time to permit the City Council to continue
its meeting. The Agency reconvened at 10:10 p.m. for public comment with
the same members present.
|
10:17 P.M.
Adjournment |
There being no further business to come before the Agency, the meeting was
adjourned at 10:17 p.m. to Saturday, March 15, 2003, 8:00 a.m. in the City
Hall Lunchroom to hold a Closed Session on the following:
Conference with Real Property Negotiator:
Pursuant to Govt. Code �54956.8
Agency Negotiator:
Assistant Executive Director/Susan M. Georgino.
Property:
250 East Olive Avenue, corner �parcel� (120� X 310�) at Olive Avenue and
Third Street.
Party With Whom Agency is Negotiating:
Michael Cusumano � Cusumano Real Estate Group.
Terms Under Negotiation:
Potential sale of Agency property.
|
s/Margarita Campos
Secretary
APPROVED MAY 27, 2003
s/Stacey Murphy
Chairperson
|