Council Agenda - City of Burbank

Tuesday, July 17, 2001

Agenda Item - 10


 

CITY OF BURBANK

 

DATE: July 10, 2001
TO:

Robert R. Ovrom, City Manager/Executive Director

FROM:

Susan M. Georgino, Community Development Director/Assistant Executive Director

Susan Evans, Asst. CDD for Redevelopment and Housing

By:  Jack Lynch, Senior Redevelopment Project Manager

SUBJECT:

Housing and Childcare Center Demonstration Project 2245�2251 North Fairview

Street and 2242�2308 North Ontario Street

 

PURPOSE:

 

The purpose of this report is for the City Council and Redevelopment Agency to consider the development of a Housing and Childcare Center Demonstration Project by M. David Paul and Associates including Planned Development No. 2000-3 (PD), a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) and related documents.

 

BACKGROUND:

 

The lack of quality and affordable childcare services has been a widely recognized problem facing states and localities across the nation.  In recognition of this problem, the City developed a Childcare Master Plan to determine the childcare needs within the City and identify ways to increase the amount of quality childcare throughout the City.  Reflecting the nationwide trends, the Master Plan determined that there is a chronic shortage of childcare for infants (0-2 years old), and a substantial shortage of childcare for toddlers and pre-schoolers (2-5 years old).

 

In response to these shortages, the City Council formed a Policy Group to study the development of a Childcare Center Demonstration Project to facilitate the development of quality childcare centers within the City. The Policy Group set specific goals for the Demonstration Project including the following:

 

1.                  The Demonstration Project should specifically address the lack of infant care within the City.

 

2.                  A percentage of the childcare spaces should be available at affordable levels.

 

3.                  The Center should be designed and operated in a high quality fashion.

 

4.                  If possible, the Center should not be constructed with funds from the City�s General fund, nor should it operate with any ongoing subsidy from the City or Redevelopment Agency.

 

It was also recommended that the Demonstration Project be located in the Golden State neighborhood near the Airport.  The City and Redevelopment Agency have targeted this multi-family neighborhood for revitalization efforts due to numerous factors that have led to the deterioration of the neighborhood.  The Golden State neighborhood and the proposed location of the Demonstration Project are illustrated on the map.

 

 

The Burbank Redevelopment Agency approved the acquisition of select properties to develop the childcare center in conjunction with a housing project, utilizing Redevelopment 20% Set-aside Funds for affordable housing.  The Agency strategically acquired those properties that were in the poorest condition, so that the new improvements would have the greatest impact on improving the appearance of the entire neighborhood.

 

A total of eight properties were acquired ranging from vacant lots, non-conforming businesses, and substandard apartment buildings.  All of the residents and businesses have been relocated with the assistance of a variety of relocation benefits from the Agency, and the site has been cleared of all buildings and is ready for development.

 

The Redevelopment Agency issued a Request For Proposal (RFP) to select a developer to build the proposed Housing and Childcare Center Demonstration Project.  The RFP specifically requested that developers build an ownership housing project, to bring more stability into the multi-family neighborhood, while also offering new homebuying opportunities in the City.

 

After reviewing the developer proposals, the Agency ultimately selected M. David Paul to develop the project.  M. David Paul proposed to develop 20 small-lot single-family homes along with an 8,600 square foot childcare center.  The plans for the project have been circulated among the various City Departments to receive comments on the design and various entitlements necessary for the construction of the project.

 

 

 

PROJECT DESIGN AND ENTITLEMENTS

 

DESIGN

 

The 20 homes are designed as a cluster housing project typified by small lots offset by adjacent common open space areas (Exhibit �A�). Each home is 3-stories in height and will contain three bedrooms, or 2-bedrooms plus a den with the parking located within the first floor garage.  The average lot size is approximately 1,175 square feet, and the average square feet of the homes are 1,400 square feet. 

 

 

The childcare center is a one-story building containing approximately 8,600 square feet, which can accommodate approximately 92 children (Exhibit �A�).  The childcare center includes a playground to the rear of the building, and a 12-space parking lot to accommodate the drop-off of the children during the weekdays.  This parking lot also serves as guest parking for the homes during evenings and weekends.  Employee parking will be provided across the street in the Media Center North office project.  The architectural style of the childcare center and the homes utilizes �Cape Cod� features and elements.

 

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER ENTITLEMENTS

 

The zoning of the property is R-4 Residential Multi-Family Medium Density. However, the project has characteristics of both single-family and multi-family development. This cluster style housing found in many new housing developments contain development standards, which currently are not reflected in the Burbank Municipal Code.  These alternative design standards may be considered on their merit through the Planned Development process allowed by the code.

 

As discussed below, staff believes that the proposed modifications meet the intent of the Planned Development provisions in the code.  The following exceptions are being proposed under the Planned Development as alternatives to the R-4 development standards specified in the code:

 

 

1.         Exceptions

 

a.                   Lot Area � The Burbank Municipal Code states that each standard single family lot shall have a minimum of 6,000 square feet.  The proposed residential lots have been designed with lot sizes of 1,131 square feet and 1,218 square feet in size.  This is typical of a cluster housing project with small lots offset by adjacent common open space.  In this case, the project includes 11,338 square feet of common open space areas for the entire project, which will be owned and maintained by a homeowners association.

 

b.                  Front Yard Setbacks� R-4 residential lots require a front yard not less than fifteen feet deep. The proposed residential lots have been designed with a maximum of seven-foot (7�) front yards.  The front yards would be designed as landscaped �aprons� to a traditional front porch treatment for each dwelling.

 

c.         Side, and Rear Yard Setbacks - Each residential lot shall have a side and rear yard not less than five feet (5�) deep.  The proposed residential lots have been designed with seven-foot (7�) side yards setbacks and zero (0�) rear yard setbacks. All �rear yards� would be adjacent to an open driveway.  Since the planned development site plan would control issuance of building permits for the project, each unit would be separated by a minimum of seven (7) feet.  All rear yards would e adjacent to an open driveway.

 

d.                  Lot Coverage � No more than sixty (60) percent of the lot area shall be occupied by buildings.  The proposed dwellings have been designed with eight (8) lots having sixty-five percent (65%) lot coverage while the remaining twelve (12) lots would meet this lot coverage requirement with a maximum of sixty percent (60%).  This is without counting adjacent common open space.

 

e.       Lot Dimensions � The Burbank Municipal Code states that each lot shall have a minimum width of fifty feet (50�) and a minimum depth of one hundred feet (100�).  The proposed site plan indicates that most lots will have a width of 28 feet and a depth of 43.5 feet.  This yields a lot area of 1,131 square feet.  Several other lots with slightly larger dimensions have an area of 1,218 square feet.  Again this is typical of cluster home development with small lots offset by adjacent common open space.

 

f.        Childcare Center Setbacks � The underlying zone is R-4 which requires the front yard setback to have a minimum of fifteen (15) feet.  The proposed childcare center has been designed with reduced setbacks that have a minimum of three (3) feet at its lowest point while tapering to seven feet eight inches (7�8�) and again to ten feet five inches (10�5�) at it�s widest point.   It should be noted that the childcare committee has recommended that the play yard should be placed in an area away from the street.  Due to lot size constraints, play yard specifications as per state regulations, and safety concerns, the project has been designed in its proposed configuration.  As mitigation for this small setback from the street, the daycare center fa�ade has been designed to provide visual relief along the Ontario Street frontage.

 

g.      Childcare Center use in an R-4 Zone - The Burbank Municipal Code allows a public or private educational institution (childcare facility) to be operated in a R-4 residential multi-family medium density zone upon the granting of a conditional use permit.  It is staff�s assessment that a childcare facility is compatible with the proposed residential development and the other multi-family residential dwellings in the vicinity, particularly as a transition from the office complex across the street to multi-family residential.  In this case, discretionary review and approval of the Planned Development would take the place of a conditional use permit approval.

 

h.      Comparison Summary Table  - The table below summarizes in more comprehensive detail the comparison of R-1 and R-4 development standards with the features of the proposed project.

 

Comparison of Burbank Municipal Code Standards to Proposed Project

 

R-1

R-4

Proposed Residential Dwellings

Proposed Child Care Center

Density

7 d.u./ac.

58 d.u./ac.

20 d.u./ac.

N/A

Lot Area

6,000 sf

6,000 sf

1,218 sf

*23,171 sf

Lot Coverage

60%

70%

60% / 65%

*37%

Front Yard Setback

25�

15�

7�

3� / 7�8� / 10�5�

Side Yard Setback

5�

5�

7� / 0�

*5� / 70�

Rear Yard Setback

0-5�

5�

0

*5�

Lot Dimensions

50x100

50x100

28x43.5

*174� x 136�

Second Story Setback

N/A

5�

**N/A

N/A

Guest Parking

N/A

1 per 5 d.u.

12  Shared 

*12 On-Site

*12 Off-Site

Common Open Space

N/A

150 sf per unit

* 566 sf per unit

N/A

Private Open Space

N/A

 50 sf per unit

*50 sf per unit

N/A

Landscaping

N/A

15% of Lot

* 11,338 sf total c.o.s.

*Yes

Building Entries

N/A

Entry or Alcove

** N/A

N/A

Outdoor Amenities

N/A

Yes

In Open Space Areas

N/A

Trash Enclosure

N/A

Yes

Individual Containers

Yes

Balcony Design

N/A

Yes

Yes

N/A

Fa�ade Requirements

N/A

Yes

**N/A

N/A

Driveways

N/A

Decorative Paving

**N/A

N/A

 

*  Note: The following section 3 meets or exceeds the requirements of either the single-family or multi-family residential development standards.

 

** The R-1 development standards have been applied to this section and are therefore non-applicable.

 

2.                  Permitted and Conditional Uses

 

The property development standards for the proposed project shall be those set forth by the project development plan, and the development agreement, including but not limited to, permitted uses, density, setbacks, and landscaping.  All uses not specifically mentioned are by default prohibited uses. 

 

3.                  Interdepartmental Review Comments:

 

The subject application and plans were routed to city departments for review and comment on August 14, 2000. The recommended conditions of approval and list of code requirements that cover these comments are in the Development Agreement (Exhibit �B�).

 

4.                  Mitigated Negative Declaration:

 

Consistent with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a mitigated negative declaration has been prepared (Exhibit �C�).  This document indicates that with the mitigation measures proposed, this project will not have a significant adverse affect on the environment.  A comprehensive list of mitigation measures is included within this document. These mitigation measures are also included in the recommended conditions of approval.  Issues addressed in the �Initial Study� upon which the mitigated negative declaration is based include the following:

 

a.       Traffic:  Transportation planning staff prepared a Trip Generation Impact Study dated 9/28/00, that concludes that no significant traffic impacts are anticipated as a result of the development of this project.

 

b.      Parking:  Although the Burbank Municipal Code does not require guest parking for single family dwellings, guest parking would be available by allowing the utilization of idle childcare center parking during non business hours of the childcare facility.  As per a report dated November 13, 2000, Crain & Associates has reviewed the shared parking concept between residential guest parking and unoccupied childcare facility parking and has concluded that this can be accomplished successfully.  Guests would be allowed to park within the childcare center parking lot during evening hours Monday through Friday and all day on weekends.

 

c.       Noise:  Typically the intent of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is to analyze the effects that the project would have on its physical environment.  However, in this case the physical environment could potentially have a significant effect on project residents caused by the ambient noise from nearby noise generators such as the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport. To mitigate any potentially significant effects on the residential dwellings and/or occupants of the childcare center, the developer shall provide a noise attenuation analysis to determine the extent of how much mitigation would be required to reduce noise levels to acceptable levels.  Additionally, the proposed buildings shall be designed in such a manner that the interior spaces are exposed to a weighted day/night noise level (Ldn) of no more than 45 decibels (dB).  Some recommendations to satisfy this requirement would be as follows:

 

        Installing sound-rated windows suitable for the noise reduction required;

        Configuring and insulating exterior walls and roofing systems to reduce the interior noise to acceptable levels; and

        Complying with the recommendations prescribed within the required noise attenuation analysis.

 

5.                  Vesting Tentative Tract Map:

The proposed project incorporates a Vesting Tentative Tract Map, which creates a total of twenty-two (22) lots with Lot 1 designed for the childcare center.  Lot 2 is designed to include all the common areas controlled by a homeowners association and lots 3-20 have been designed for individually owned residential dwelling units (Exhibit �D�).  Utility and vehicle access easements shall be provided within the childcare center driveway.

 

6.                  Notice:

Notice of the proposed project was published in the Burbank Leader and mailed to property owners and tenants within a 1000-foot radius of the subject property on January 31, 2001.

 

7.                  Development Agreement:

 

A Development Agreement, which includes a list of the proposed Conditions of Approval has been prepared (Exhibit �B�).

 

PLANNING BOARD HEARING

 

A hearing on the Planned Development, Vesting Tract Map and Mitigated Negative Declaration was held by the Planning Board on February 12, 2001, and subsequently rescheduled to May 14, 2001.  At the May 14th hearing, the Planning Board voted (3-2) to adopt Resolution No. 2820 recommending that the City Council approve the proposed entitlements as requested by M. David Paul & Associates.  Board members Vander Borght, Jackson, and Olsen voted in support of the project, while Board members Berlin and Hunt voted against the project due to concerns  of incompatibility with the nearby airport.

 

DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

 

While the Planned Development and related documents were being prepared, the Agency was also working with the developer to conclude the major terms for conveying the site to the developer and the terms for developing the improvements.  These parameters are outlined in the Disposition and Development Agreement (Exhibit �E�).  The major deal points are summarized as follows:

 

1.         The Agency will sell the entire site consisting of approximately 1.56 acres to the developer for one dollar.  The site will be sold clear of buildings and utilities.

 

2.                  The developer will construct 20 detached homes averaging 1,400 square feet on approximately two-thirds of the site.  In addition, the developer will construct the shell of an 8,600 square foot childcare center and a drop-off parking area on the remaining one-third of the site.

 

3.                  Once completed, the developer will sell the childcare center including the underlying land to a non-profit organization identified by the Agency for one dollar.  With the Agency�s assistance, the non-profit organization will complete the interior improvements to the facility.  In addition, the Agency will be responsible for installing the electrical transformers for the site.

 

4.                  The developer will sell 10 of the homes to buyers whose incomes are restricted to moderate income levels (120% of median income), at a sales price of $190,000 each.  The remaining 10 homes will be sold on a market rate basis estimated at $225,000.  The Agency will retain a promissory note on the 10 restricted income households for the difference between the $190,000 purchase price, and the fair market value of the homes ($225,000 - $190,000 = $35,000). If the homebuyer remains in the home for 30 years, the loan will be forgiven.  If the homebuyer sells the home to another income-restricted homebuyer before the 30-year period expires, the note may be assigned to the new homebuyer.  If, however, the homebuyer sells the home prior to the end of 30 years to a non-qualified buyer, the Agency shall receive the entire amount of the note ($35,000) plus a share in the appreciation of the home value.   The intent of the promissory note is to continue targeting these homes to moderate income households for as long as reasonably possible as required under Redevelopment Law.

 

5.         In addition to the promissory note on the moderate-income homes, the Agency shall also receive 50% of the net profits on the market-rate homes for any home that sells in excess of $240,000.  For example, if the home sells for $250,000, the Agency will receive 50% of $10,000, or $5,000.  The intent of this provision is to restrict the developer from receiving excess profits should the housing market improve markedly.   

 

CHILDCARE CENTER

 

While the 20 new homes are intended to improve the existing conditions in the multi-family neighborhood, an equally important goal for this project is to provide quality childcare for the community.   Part of the reason that there is such a shortage of childcare centers is that there is little incentive for the private sector to construct centers, because there is virtually no profit in doing so.  The only two privately developed centers in Burbank were built by Warner Bros. and Disney.  Both were built to recruit and retain employees, and are not available to the public.

 

The only other center-based providers are owned by the School District (Horace Mann) and the YMCA, which are both non-profit owner/operators.  In previous reports to the Agency, it was demonstrated that the revenue generated from tuition fees usually just covers the operating costs necessary to run the centers.  This leaves virtually no resources for major capital costs associated with land acquisition and the construction of the center. The capital costs associated with land acquisition and construction are the main obstacles for having more center-based care.

 

The utilization of Redevelopment Agency funds for site assemblage in partnership with a housing developer who will construct the shell of the childcare center, allows the Demonstration Project to overcome the obstacles associated with these capital costs.  However, to accomplish this, and maintain a high percentage of affordable units in the housing project, the DDA proposes to waive the Agency�s policy of encouraging the use of prevailing wages by the developer, and the non-profit organization that will own and construct the interior improvements of the childcare center.  This recommendation is consistent with other affordable housing projects undertaken by the Agency.      

 

Even with the Agency�s assistance, the non-profit owner of the childcare center may still need to obtain additional resources for operating the center. The current plan for the childcare center is to accommodate 92 children.  This includes 12 spaces for infant care. Many childcare centers do not provide infant care because of the high cost associated with the staff levels needed for infant care, which requires a high staffing ratio that is often prohibitively expensive.    In fact, to ensure that the center operates to the level of the highest accreditation standards, high staffing levels are proposed for all age groups.  The City�s Childcare Committee felt it was particularly important that the Center operates at the highest standard, if the Demonstration Project was to be a model for future centers. Furthermore, it is proposed that the Center reserve as much as 20% of the spaces at subsidized tuition rates.  The impact these program targets have on the operation costs can be quite costly.

 

To address these operational issues, staff is looking at three possible funding sources to supplement the tuition fees for the Center.  The funding sources include: 1) Federal, State and local grant programs for childcare; 2) partnerships with local businesses that could help subsidize the operation of the center; and, 3) funding from the non-profit corporation that will ultimately own the facility.  Staff is already in discussions with the non-profit Burbank Housing Corporation as a potential owner of the facility.   The Burbank Housing Corporation may be able to utilize rent revenue from its housing portfolio as a means to provide additional support, similar to the way the Burbank Housing Corporation funds the operation of the Achievement Center on Elmwood Avenue.

 

By utilizing Redevelopment Agency funds to assist with the capital improvements, and with the other operational funding sources being targeted, a quality childcare center should be able to be built and operated without requiring any assistance from the City�s General Fund. 

 

 SUMMARY REPORT

 

Section 33433 of the California Health and Safety Code requires a Summary Report to be prepared to address the economics of the proposed Disposition and Development Agreement (Exhibit �F�).  The Summary Report, among other things, looks at the salient points of the Agreement and analyzes the cost of the Agreement to the Agency and addresses the re-use value of the properties being sold.

 

Most of the Agency costs are associated with land acquisition, relocation and demolition. The Agency is also responsible for certain utility improvements and interior improvements to the childcare center, which will be undertaken by the non-profit organization that will own and operate the childcare center.  Since this project is located outside of a Redevelopment Project Area, there will not be any tax increment revenue generated from the project.  The following outlines the costs to the Agency.

 

            Site Acquisition                                                 $2,248,500

            Relocation                                                                         426,400

            Demolition                                                                         257,300

            Utility Relocation                                                                 75,000

            Electrical Transformer Installation                                         75,000

            Interior Improvements for the Childcare Center      385,000

 

                        Total Cost to the Agency                               $3,467,200

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

 

The Agency has budgeted and carried-over $3,470,000 in the FY 2000-01 Annual Budget.

 

CONCLUSIONS:

 

The proposed Housing and Childcare Center Demonstration Project has several important goals.  The project removes substandard apartment buildings and non-conforming business uses, and replaces them with single family homes.  These homes will offer new homeownership opportunities, and provide more stability into the multi-family neighborhood, which has suffered the negative affects of a transitory resident base.  More importantly, the project offers the City and Agency an opportunity to help alleviate the major shortage of quality childcare in the City without using the City�s General Fund that is earmarked for other City services such as Police, Fire, Parks and Recreation services.  The Childcare Center also offers a special amenity to the immediate neighborhood including the opportunity for more affordable, quality childcare.  In a sense, this project will serve as a cornerstone of the Golden State neighborhood, much like the Achievement Center has been for the Elmwood neighborhood.

 

The proposed project has received the support and endorsement of the Golden State Citizen Advisory Committee, and the City�s Childcare Committee.  It is therefore recommended that the Agency and City Council approve the proposed project.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

It is recommended that the City Council and Redevelopment Agency approve the proposed Resolutions approving the development of the Housing and Childcare Center Demonstration Project.

 

EXHIBITS:

 

A         Conceptual Plans and Applications

B          Development Agreement and Conditions of Approval

C         Mitigated Negative Declaration

D         Vesting Tentative Tract Map

E          Disposition and Development Agreement

F          Summary Report

 

Daycar48a(C:)