Ms. Alvord
reported that at the last joint meeting, questions were raised with regard
to the feasibility of phasing the John Burroughs High School stadium and
field projects. She invited Ms. Teaford, Public Works Director, to
elaborate on staff�s follow-up efforts regarding the issue.
Ms. Teaford
reported that staff requested the consultant, CMX Sports Engineers (CMX),
to take another look at the conceptual layout for the track and field at
John Burroughs High School with respect to the existing bleachers. She
added that specifically, there was a concern about the feasibility of
phasing the project and a conclusion was made that the preferred
eight-lane 42 inch-wide configuration with a three foot-wide safety zone
surrounding the outside lane would require the demolition of the visitor
side bleachers and would leave the home side bleachers not centered at the
50 yard line. She stated that staff recommended against phasing the
project and requested that the bleachers be an integral part of the
project.
Mrs. Ramos
inquired about the capacity of the new stadium and Ms. Teaford responded
that any renovation or re-building efforts will result in a loss in
seating capacity, but added that a completely new stadium would provide
approximately 5,100 seats as opposed to the current 7,500, with a
possibility of bringing in temporary bleachers for events such as the
Burbank/Burroughs game. Dr. Bowman also clarified that if the focus is on
a single event such as the Burbank/Burroughs game, there is a loss in
seating capacity, but there were not many other major events that fill the
stadium. He also noted that depending on the budget, seating capacity
could be added on either side. He added that the new seats will meet
Americans with Disabilities Act standards and will be more comfortable and
durable.
Mr. Kemp
inquired as to the impact of large vehicles such as Fire trucks on the
field. Mr. Jellison, BUSD Chief Facilities Officer, responded that it is
not recommended that heavy vehicles drive on artificial tracks, unless in
the event of an emergency. He also noted that plywood would be placed
underneath the footprint of the temporary bleacher sets such that the
artificial track is not affected.
There was
subsequent discussion regarding additional capacity of the temporary
bleachers and placement of the scoreboard. Ms. Alvord stated that staff
would follow up with the consultant with regard to meeting the graduation
capacity as well as placement of the scoreboard. She referenced Exhibit 3
which addressed the issue of usage and noted that the exhibit was provided
by the BUSD.
Mr. Golonski
requested for an update on the potential funding from the State
infrastructure bonds. Dr. Bowman responded that the BUSD will receive a
little over $8 million, but the projects would have to be approved by the
Division of the State Architect (DSA) and forwarded to the Allocation
Board, and funds would be received once the project is underway. He added
that at the December 2006 meeting of the Oversight Committee, the figures
were readjusted based upon DSA approval and, at this time, approximately
$6,321,490 will be left after the completion of the four existing
modernization projects. He further stated that on December 21, 2006, the
BUSD Board received a list of the District-wide facilities needs with a
preliminary cost estimate of $12,279,916 and noted that the list is not
yet complete. He added that the BUSD Board would prioritize the list and
fund the needs to the extent possible. He explained that the list
included items such as roofs at the schools and asphalt on playgrounds, in
addition to others.
Mr. Golonski
noted the opportunity to free up additional funds in lieu of bond funds to
bridge the funding gap, especially where the repairs are Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) eligible. Ms. Alvord cautioned that the
CDBG application period has recently closed and that the first opportunity
for CDBG funding would be approximately one year away. Ms. Teaford also
added that CDBG funding has been shrinking over the past years and there
is a possibility that most of the funds will be channeled to the New
Orleans area to aid in the Hurricane Katrina recovery efforts.
Mr. Applebaum
noted the $2.9 million funding gap and reiterated the need to guarantee
all funding prior to signing a contract. He also stated that the longer
the delay the greater the funding shortfall and supported moving forward
with utmost speed.
Dr. Gordon noted
that he toured all the sites in question, requested clarification with
regard to the possibility of scrap metal value from the existing bleachers
at Memorial Field and inquired as to whether the individuals interested in
acquiring the scrap metal would participate in the demolition process. He
also noted that the tracks are in desperate need of improvement but stated
that there are serious health considerations with respect to the
artificial turf as well as the associated maintenance costs. Ms. Alvord
stated that she would not comment on the biochemical issues but noted that
from a community aspect, it is the field and not the track that was
critical, and the synthetic turf would provide the additional days,
flexibility and durability necessary, as the fields will not have to be
shut down for maintenance purposes. She also noted that there will be a
joint use agreement that will address the maintenance issues but staff
would continue to look into the safety issues.
Mr. Kemp noted
that the BUSD maintenance staff was doing an excellent job on maintaining
the fields but given that there is no other similar facility, the constant
overuse has resulted in the deterioration of the fields.
Dr. Bowman
requested Mr. Jellison to respond to the heat and health concerns. Mr.
Jellison stated that the fields will get hot due to the compounds in the
makeup of the field; however, sprinklers can be installed to cool the
ambient temperature to an acceptable level at any time. As it relates to
any biohazards, he stated that there are classes given to response teams
and a kit will be made available at each site to be used for cleaning up
any biohazards and staff would be properly trained to respond to any
injuries. Dr. Bowman also added that he recently talked with the
superintendents of La Ca�ada, Arcadia and Glendale School Districts with
artificial fields and none of them expressed any concern about biohazards
or increased injuries but noted that their communities have been delighted
with the access and ability to use the fields. He also stated that video
cameras with infrared technology and capability to take photographs at
night will be installed to improve security.
Mrs. Ramos
stated that from a subcommittee�s perspective, all those questions were
asked with regard to heat, maintenance, replacement costs and infections,
and a conclusion was made to rely on the experts and to set aside adequate
funds for maintenance and replacement. She also expressed her preference
to move forward with the entire package and not separate the field and
track projects.
Mr. Kemp
requested Mr. Jellison to provide an overview of the maintenance equipment
and the associated cost of $87,000 that will be provided by the BUSD.
Mr. Vander
Borght also added that in 2001 the BUSD studied the issue and a decision
was made to provide an artificial field.
It was moved by
Mr. Golonski seconded by Mr. Vander Borght and carried that �staff proceed
with the planning for the synthetic track surface and artificial turf.�
It was moved by
Mr. Applebaum seconded by Mr. Kemp and carried that �staff proceed with
the planning for the synthetic track surface and artificial turf.�
Mr. Golonski
noted the difference in the level of complexity of both projects but
suggested that the Burbank High School Project proceed as soon as possible
and not wait for the details of the John Burroughs Project. Dr. Bowman
informed the bodies that CMX estimated 65 days for the preparation and 112
days for construction and as such, the project would not be completed by
the summer, but staff would try to fast track it to the extent possible.
Dr. Gordon
inquired as to whether the projects will use the Guaranteed Maximum Price
versus the Design-Bid-Build process. He also inquired if there has been
any subcommittee consideration of issuing bonds that might be necessary to
complete the projects. Ms. Alvord responded that staff will consult with
similar projects that have been completed to determine the most
appropriate approach. She also added that it was not the direction of the
subcommittee to issue bonds.
Mr. Applebaum
noted that the BUSD has huge infrastructure needs that are unmet by
modernization funds. He stated that at some point in the future, the BUSD
would go out for a bond to bridge the gap to complete the school
infrastructure needs. He added that if there is a funding shortfall for
the athletic facilities projects, it could be tied into the bond. He
hoped the BUSD did not have to get to that point but ultimately, the
fields needed to be taken care of. He also inquired as to whether an
escrow account would be established in which funds would be deposited to
cover the costs. Ms. Alvord responded that it was up to both bodies to
provide that direction.
It was moved by
Mr. Vander Borght seconded by Mrs. Ramos and carried that �staff return to
the Council at the earliest possible time with a funding mechanism to
provide $11.65 million for the purpose of renovation of the Burbank High
School and John Burroughs High School fields and improvements to the
Jordan Junior High School field with all the caveats discussed such that
the funds are set aside and committed towards completion of the
projects.� Mr. Golonski clarified that the funds would include the City�s
$9 million contribution, $650,000 owed to the BUSD, and $2 million for the
Jordan project funded by the YES Fund.�
It was moved by
Ms. Kukta, seconded by Mr. Kemp and carried that �at the next BUSD Board
meeting a motion be placed on the agenda to address the funding
contribution and source of $2 million towards these projects.�
Mr. Vander
Borght emphasized the need for the community to come together to fundraise
and bridge the funding shortfall.
There was
subsequent discussion with regard to the significance of Memorial Field
and a need to set aside a space to memorialize those individuals.
Mr. Applebaum
noted the BUSD�s policy that all facilities meet California High
Performance Schools standards and expressed his desire that the final
project design and architecture incorporate those standards.
|