|
Present- |
Council Members Golonski, Ramos and Vander Borght. |
|
Absent - - - - |
Council Member Campbell. |
|
Also Present - |
Ms. Alvord, City Manager; Mr. Barlow, City Attorney; and, Mrs. Campos,
City Clerk.
|
|
Oral
Communications |
There was no response to the Mayor�s invitation for oral communications on
Closed Session matters at this time.
|
|
4:35 P.M.
Recess |
The Council recessed at this time to the City Hall Basement Lunch
Room/Conference Room to hold a Closed Session on the following:
|
|
|
a. Conference with Labor Negotiator:
Pursuant to Govt. Code �54957.6
Name
of the Agency Negotiator:
Management Services Director/Judie Sarquiz.
Name of Organization Representing Employee:
Represented: Burbank City Employees Association, Burbank Management
Association, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers;
Unrepresented, and Appointed Officials.
Summary of Labor Issues to be Negotiated:
Contracts and Retirement Issues.
|
|
5:43 P.M.
Inclusionary
Housing and
Density Bonus
Study Session |
Mrs. Forbes, Deputy
City Planner, Community Development Department, reported that in 2003 the
Council directed staff to proceed with the establishment of an
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance which would require developers to include
affordable units within new residential projects. She noted that the
ordinance was a recommendation from the Blue Ribbon Task Force on
Affordable Housing. She discussed that the basic parameters of the
ordinance are: 15 percent of the units to be made affordable; ownership
projects shall be made affordable to moderate-income households and rental
units shall be made available for very-low and low-income households;
projects of four units or less would be exempt; the term of affordability
would be in perpetuity or have re-sale provisions for ownership units;
alternatives to on-site construction would be provided but only under
certain circumstances; and, the affordable housing agreement would be
processed along with Development Review. She then noted staff�s proposal
that projects with a completed Development Review application by the
effective date of the ordinance be exempt and that the ordinance have a
phased-in approach whereby the affordability would only apply to 10
percent of the units in the first six months, and thereafter to 15 percent
of the units.
Mrs. Forbes added
that pursuant to Council direction, staff formed a focus group of
stakeholders to examine the details of the ordinance. She added that the
Planning Board considered the ordinance in 2004 and expressed concerns
with its feasibility considering the then-pending multi-family standards,
new density bonus law and possible changes to density standards. She added
that at the joint Council/ Planning Board study session held in May 2005,
the Council expressed concern with the length of affordability and the
density bonus law, but gave staff direction to proceed with the
ordinance. She added that the Planning Board has since considered the
ordinance and three members did not support the ordinance, citing
philosophical objections to inclusionary zoning and the fact that
developers have to pay for the cost of providing affordable units.
Mrs. Forbes informed
the Council that the purpose of the study session was to receive Council
input on the implementing regulations and the in-lieu fee study.
Regarding the in-lieu fee, she explained that the ordinance proposes that
projects with five to nine units be able to pay the fee by-right and
projects with more than nine units require Council approval upon proving
that its not financially feasible to provide the units on-site. She added
that the fee proposed is the actual gap between the market rate unit and
the cost of providing the affordable unit. She noted that if the fee
adopted is less than the gap cost, it would be more financially feasible
to pay the fee than to construct the unit on-site.
With regard to the
implementing regulations, and specifically the concessions and the tiering
system developed by staff, Mrs. Forbes stated that the concessions will
allow developers to vary from the multi-family development standards. She
noted that staff categorized the concessions in the following three tiers:
administrative approval; Planning Board approval; and, Council approval.
She stated that staff believed that tiering would benefit the City by
providing an easy way for developers to get up to three concessions in a
simple process. She noted a concern expressed by the Planning Board that
the public may perceive that they have the right to affect the approval or
denial of a concession; however, the decision will be based solely on the
findings consistent with the State density bonus law. She explained that
the findings mostly relate to the fact that the concession is financially
necessary for the developer to provide the affordable units. She stated
that staff is proposing to retain the services of a financial firm to
evaluate proformas on the financial feasibility but the standard of review
by staff, the Planning Board or the Council will be maintained. She noted
that the density bonus law is strict with the findings and the tiering of
concessions is designed so that the developer does not have to go through
a lengthy process which might bring the City�s compliance with State law
into question.
Council discussion
centered around: the interaction between the density bonus law and
inclusionary zoning; the per-unit gap cost; the State-mandated density
bonus law overriding the City�s parking requirements, and its
applicability to ownership units, rental units and projects requiring
discretionary review; ownership and rental unit fee schedules; the
projected number of total units and affordable units over a five-year
horizon; and, concessions that eliminate open space requirements and allow
an increase in lot coverage. The Council also expressed concern with the
possibility of encouraging smaller units or one-bedroom units with
minimized parking requirements.
The Council
requested a further analysis on the in-lieu fee and inclusionary
percentages.
|
|
6:37 P.M.
Recess |
The Council recessed at this time.
|
|
Regular Meeting
Reconvened in
Council Chambers |
The regular meeting of the Council of the City of Burbank was reconvened
at 6:46 p.m. by Mr. Vander Borght, Mayor.
|
|
Invocation
|
The invocation was given by Reverend Sally Kinarthy, Unity Church of
Burbank and North Hollywood.
|
|
Flag Salute
ROLL CALL |
The pledge of allegiance to the flag was led by Mr. Kramer, Community
Assistance Coordinator. |
|
Present- |
Council Members Campbell, Golonski, Ramos and Vander Borght. |
|
Absent - - - - |
Council Members None. |
|
Also Present - |
Ms. Alvord, City Manager; Mr. Barlow, City Attorney; and, Mrs. Campos,
City Clerk.
|
|
Report on Liaisons and Committees |
Mayor Vander Borght
reported on a meeting he held with Los Angeles Council Member LaBonge to
discuss issues of importance to
Burbank and Los
Angeles, and specifically the proposed Los Angeles sewer project that may
impact Burbank residents. He noted that Council Member LaBonge will be
addressing the Council at the end of January 2006.
|
|
406
Airport Authority
Meeting |
Commissioner
Lombardo reported on the Airport Authority meeting of
November 21, 2005.
He stated that the Authority awarded a contract for Bid Schedule No.
2005-24 in the amount of $286,000 to BBS Construction, Inc. for the
maintenance facility repairs and mitigation, and approved: the revised
selection criteria for future professional services agreements; the
Federal Aviation Administration airport surveillance radar site land
lease; and, the GTC Management Services, Inc.�s sublease agreement with
Valhalla Aviation.
The Council noted
and filed the report.
|
|
7:07 P.M.
Hearing
1504
2005 Urban Water
Mgmt. Plan |
Mayor Vander Borght
stated that �this is the time and place for the hearing on the City�s
adoption of the Urban Water Management Plan 2005.�
|
|
Meeting
Disclosures
|
There were no
meeting disclosures. |
|
Notice
Given |
The City Clerk was
asked if notices had been given as required by law. She replied in the
affirmative and advised that no written communications had been received.
|
|
Staff
Report |
Mr. Mace, Assistant
General Manager/Water Systems, Burbank Water and Power (BWP), presented
BWP�s 2005 Urban Water Management Plan. He reported that the basic
purpose of the Plan is to ensure that water providers are planning
effectively to provide reliable water supply for current and projected
demands. He explained that the Plan is required by the California Urban
Water Management Planning Act which specifies topics to be addressed and
mandates a five-year update.
With the aid of a
PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Mace discussed
Burbank�s
water resources through the year 2030, and the plan contents, which
include: Chapter I, the introduction; Chapter II, service area
information; Chapter III, water supplies and demands; and, Chapter IV,
demand management measures. He elaborated on staff�s efforts with regard
to the following demand management measures: water survey programs for
single-family and multi-family residential customers; residential plumbing
retrofit; system water audits, leak detection and repair; metering with
commodity rates for all new connections and retrofit of existing ones;
large landscape conservation programs and incentives; high-efficiency
washing machine rebate programs; public information programs; school
education programs; conservation programs for commercial, industrial and
institutional accounts; conservation pricing; conservation coordinator;
water waste prohibition; and, residential ultra-low flush toilet
replacement programs. He continued to discuss Chapter V, water recycling;
Chapter VI, comparison of water supplies and demands; and, Chapter VII,
water shortage contingency plan.
|
|
Citizen
Comment |
Appearing to comment
were: Mike Nolan, commending the progress made during the past several
years, and commenting on Chrome 6 impact on water supply, ground water
replenishment and requesting that the Council receive regular updates on
the matter; and, Esther Espinoza, inquiring as to any potential increases
in water rates and commenting on water conservation.
|
|
Staff rebuttal |
Mr. Mace responded to public comment with regard to water replenishment.
|
|
Hearing
Closed |
There being no further response to the Mayor�s invitation for oral
comment, the hearing was declared closed.
|
|
Motion |
It was moved by Mr. Campbell and seconded by Mr. Golonski that "the
following resolution be passed and adopted:�
|
|
1504
2005 Urban
Water Mgmt.
Plan
|
RESOLUTION NO. 27,117:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK ADOPTING URBAN WATER
MANAGEMENT PLAN 2005. |
|
Adopted |
The resolution was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members
Campbell, Golonski, Ramos and
Vander Borght.
Noes: Council Members None.
Absent: Council Members None.
|
|
Reporting on
Closed Session |
Mr. Barlow reported on the items considered by the City Council during the
Closed Session meeting.
|
|
Initial Open
Public Comment
Period of Oral
Communications |
Mr. Vander Borght
called for speakers for the initial open public comment period of oral
communications at this time.
|
|
Citizen
Comment |
Appearing to comment
were: Don Elsmore, on the Magnolia Boulevard resurfacing project; Floran
Frank, on sewer odors in the Rancho Area; R. C. Chappy Czapiewski, on the
P-38 display at Bob Hope Airport; Eden Rosen, on additional caregivers
support groups and home-delivered meals; Molly and Stan Hyman, on the
Fence Ordinance enforcement; Sam Asheghian, on the success of the Holiday
In The Park event; Carolyn Berlin, requesting clarification on the hour
restrictions with regard to homeowners performing construction work; Phil
Berlin, on the need to maintain Burbank�s identity separate from Los
Angeles�; James Schad, in opposition to anonymous complaints and
requesting a status on the geothermal program; Michael Scandiffio, on the
proposed Los Angeles sewer line and enforcement of the Fence Ordinance;
Esther Espinoza, on the recycled water program and the cost of water; Rose
Prouser, on the Home Depot project; Howard Rothenbach, on a redevelopment
conference he attended; Mark Barton, on the City logo; David Piroli, on
Assembly Bill 556 with regard to Los Angeles International Airport
avigation easements; Irma Loose, on enforcement of the Fence Ordinance;
and, Mike Nolan, on parking in downtown Burbank.
|
|
Staff
Response |
Members of the
Council and staff responded to questions raised.
|
|
Agenda Item Oral Communications
|
Mr. Vander Borght
called for speakers for the agenda item oral communications at this time.
|
|
Citizen
Comment |
Appearing to comment
were: Mel Peffers, in support of the proposed clean construction
equipment ordinance; Don Elsmore, on the potential of achieving a
nighttime curfew at Bob Hope Airport; Carolyn Berlin, in support of
waiving confidentiality on the legal opinion regarding a Planning Board
member and on the inclusionary housing ordinance; Tony Church, requesting
the resignation of a Planning Board member; Jim Macris, on the conflict of
interest issue with regard to a Planning Board member; Stan Hyman, on the
proposed clean construction equipment ordinance and conflict of interest
issue regarding a Planning Board member; Irma Loose, on the Fence
Ordinance enforcement; Eden Rosen, on the gateway monument at Burbank and
Victory Boulevards and Victory Place; Phil Berlin, on past history with
regard to an avigation easement at the Airport and in support of waiving
confidentiality on the legal opinion regarding a Planning Board member;
Mark Barton, on the art installation at Burbank and Victory Boulevards and
Victory Place; Esther Espinoza, on the Magnolia Boulevard resurfacing
project; David Piroli, on release of the legal opinion with regard to a
Planning Board member and the Airport noise variance criteria; and, Mike
Nolan, on ground water replenishment.
|
|
Staff
Response |
Members of the
Council and staff responded to questions raised.
|
|
Motion |
It was moved by Mr.
Campbell and seconded by Mrs. Ramos that "the following items on the
consent calendar be approved as recommended.�
|
|
Minutes
Approved |
The minutes for the
regular meeting of
October 25, 2005
were approved as submitted.
|
|
1007-1
1009-1
Establish Spec.
For Project
Accounting
Mgr/BWP |
RESOLUTION NO. 27,118:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK ESTABLISHING THE TITLE
AND SPECIFICATION FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING MANAGER/BWP
(CTC No. 0688) AND PRESCRIBING CLASSIFICATION CODE NUMBER, SALARY AND
SPECIFICATION THEREOF.
|
|
1007-1
1009-1
1006
Abolishing
Inactive Titles
And Specs. |
RESOLUTION NO. 27,119:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK AMENDING THE
CLASSIFICATION, PAY PLAN AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE BY APPROVING THE
ABOLISHMENT OF CERTAIN JOB TITLES AND SPECIFICATIONS.
|
|
1602
405-2
Glendale Traffic-
Related Electrical
Devices Maint.
Agmt. |
RESOLUTION NO. 27,120:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK APPROVING THE
BURBANK-GLENDALE TRAFFIC-RELATED ELECTRICAL DEVICES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURBANK AND THE CITY OF GLENDALE.
|
|
1301-3
Magnolia Blvd.
Imp. Project
(B.S. 1144) |
RESOLUTION NO. 27,121:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK APPROVING AND ADOPTING
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETERMINING THE LOWEST
RESPONSIBLE BIDDER, ACCEPTING THE BID, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A
CONTRACT FOR THE MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT: STPL-5200(018)
TO GRIFFITH COMPANY, BID SCHEDULE NO. 1144.
|
|
1506
webTrader Service Agmt.
for Open Access
Technology |
RESOLUTION NO. 27,122:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK APPROVING CHANGE ORDER
NO. 08 TO THE webTRADER SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURBANK AND
OPEN ACCESS TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTENDING
THE TERM OF SAID AGREEMENT THROUGH AND INCLUDING JUNE 30, 2008.
|
|
Adopted |
The consent calendar was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members
Campbell, Golonski, Ramos and
Vander Borght.
Noes: Council Members None.
Absent: Council Members None.
|
|
1705-2
Art Installation
Burbank Blvd./
Victory Blvd./
Victory Pl. |
Mr. Hansen, Park,
Recreation and Community Services Director, reported that at
the October 18, 2005 meeting, the Council requested a discussion on the
potential of developing a gateway public art installation at the
intersection of Burbank and Victory Boulevards and Victory Place, formerly
known as Five Points. He noted that this item has been placed on the
agenda as the first step in the two-step agenda process for additional
Council discussion and consideration. He added that funding for this
project can be secured by appropriating a specific amount from either the
General Fund or the Public Art Fund, noting that Public Art Fund policies
govern the manner in which projects are brought forward and approved.
Staff was directed
to return with a second step report.
|
|
708
Extension of
Operation of the
Burbank Center
Stage |
Mr. Nelson, Deputy
Director, Park, Recreation and Community Services/Recreation Services,
requested Council approval of a 182-day extension of contract documents
for the operation of Burbank Center Stage. He stated that on
March 28, 2000,
the Council approved two resolutions related to contract documents for the
operation of Burbank Center Stage with the Colony Theatre Company
(Colony). He noted that the terms for both agreements were to commence on
the Occupancy Date and expire on the fifth anniversary of the Opening Day,
which was
August 26, 2000.
Mr. Nelson informed
the Council that the agreements allowed the City to extend the terms for
three separate and successive periods of five years each, upon the same
terms and conditions; however, with the approval from the Park, Recreation
and Community Services (PRCS) Board and the Council, the terms could be
amended, modified or eliminated. He added that in February 2005, staff
received correspondence from the Colony indicating its intent to initiate
its contractual option to renew the second of the three separate and
successive five-year periods. He stated that following a series of
meetings, it became apparent that a finalized agreement would not be
reached by the
August 27, 2005
termination date. He added that on
August 23, 2005,
the Council approved a 90-day extension which terminates on
December 1, 2005
to provide adequate time to finalize an effective agreement.
Mr. Nelson reported
that in the subsequent agreement negotiations, the Colony indicated
concerns regarding their financial status. He noted that a joint meeting
including the Colony administrative staff, a representative of the Colony
Board of Directors, the City Manager, City Attorney�s Office, and
administrative staff from the PRCS Department was scheduled to review and
discuss the Colony�s fiscal status. He added that the meeting focused on
the Colony�s proposed program to address its short- and long-range
financial issues, and discussed the three phases proposed to enhance
revenues through fundraising, sponsorships and enhanced subscriptions.
Mr. Nelson noted
that at the conclusion of the meeting, representatives from both the
Colony and the City determined that, in light of the Colony�s current
fiscal condition, it would not be prudent to initiate a second five-year
agreement. He added that the representatives concurred that an extension
of the current agreement through
May 31, 2006 would
provide the Colony a reasonable time period to initiate its fundraising
plan, kick off its annual subscription drive and implement reductions to
operational costs. He noted that under the terms of the current
agreement, the Colony will be obligated to pay its quarterly rent payments
throughout the extension period.
Mrs. Ramos expressed
support for the Colony Theatre but expressed concern with its financial
status and fundraising proposal. She suggested reviewing the financials
and operating models of successful facilities in other communities, and
supported the 182-day extension.
Barbara Beckley,
Artistic Director and Sean Cutler, Managing Director, Colony Theatre,
responded to the Council�s concern with regard to the financial shortfall
and announced a fundraiser that was being held on
November 29, 2005.
The Council
expressed support for the theatre and suggested a review of the theatre�s
operation in order to develop a model that is sustainable over the long
term. The Council also requested that information on the theatre�s events
be provided on Channel 6.
|
|
Motion |
It was moved by Mr.
Campbell and seconded by Mrs. Ramos that �the following resolutions be
passed and adopted:�
|
|
708
2nd Amend. to
Theater Operating
Agmt. with
Colony
Theatre Co. |
RESOLUTION NO. 27,123:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK APPROVING THE SECOND
AMENDMENT TO THE THEATER OPERATING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURBANK
AND THE COLONY THEATRE COMPANY RELATING TO THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER.
|
|
708
2nd Amend. to
the Sublease and
Master Lease
With Burbank
Mall Assoc. |
RESOLUTION NO. 27,124:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK APPROVING THE SECOND
AMENDMENT TO THE SUBLEASE AGREEMENT AND MASTER LEASE MODIFICATION BETWEEN
THE CITY OF BURBANK, BURBANK MALL ASSOCIATES, AND THE COLONY THEATRE
COMPANY RELATING TO THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER.
|
|
Adopted |
The resolutions were adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members
Campbell, Golonski, Ramos and
Vander Borght.
Noes: Council Members None.
Absent: Council Members None.
|
|
902
Clean Construction
Equip. Ordinance |
Mr. Van Hazelen,
Assistant Public Works Director/Fleet and Building, presented a report in
response to Vice Mayor Campbell�s request to discuss the possibility of
creating a clean construction equipment ordinance. He reported that in an
effort to further reduce air pollution, Vice Mayor Campbell provided staff
with a sample ordinance that would require all diesel-fueled construction
equipment over 50 horsepower owned and used by the City and/or contractors
working for the City on City projects, to meet more stringent emissions
standards than are currently enforced by various air quality control
agencies. He stated that if the Council desires, staff will return with a
report on the feasibility of implementing such an ordinance.
Staff was directed
to return with a second step report.
|
|
916
Update on
BWP�s
Conservation
Programs
|
Mrs. Meyer,
Marketing Manager, Burbank Water and Power (BWP), presented an update on
the following electric and water conservation programs: Made In The Shade;
Commercial Corridor Trees; Torchiere Exchange; Home Rewards Rebates; Home
Energy Analyzer; Energy Solutions; Business Bucks; Solar Photovoltaic
Energy; Landfill Microturbines; Ice Bear Installation; Clean Green
Support; Splash Into Savings; Ultra Low Flush Toilets; Water Saving
Devices; High-Efficiency Clothes Washers Rebate; Recycled Water; and,
Landscape Education.
Mrs. Meyer requested
the Council approve of the dissolution of the Splash Into Savings Program,
which provides a $5 monthly incentive to program participants in exchange
for pool pump timers set for non-peak hours only. She reported that the
program has not lived up to expectations and staff has consistently found
one-third non-compliance. Additionally, she stated that there has been a
challenge to the program�s eligibility for public benefits inclusion.
Ms. Forrest, Senior
Conservation Advisor, BWP, introduced and discussed the proposed Drip
Irrigation Program which would provide education and a drip irrigation
system kit for participating
Burbank homeowners.
She also discussed the program�s goals of reaching 1,200 single-family
homes and achieving water savings of 21.5 to 30 million gallons of water
annually. She informed the Council that staff applied for a Bureau of
Reclamation grant for this program and was awarded a 100-percent matching
grant of up to $25,848. She requested Council approval of the proposed
program and the resolution authorizing the acceptance of the grant.
|
|
Motion |
It was moved by Mr.
Golonski and seconded by Mrs. Ramos that �the following resolution be
passed and adopted:�
|
|
916
Update on
BWP�s
Conservation
Programs
|
RESOLUTION NO. 27,125:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK RATIFYING AND APPROVING
AN ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION FOR A GRANT TO FUND A RESIDENTIAL DRIP IRRIGATION
PROGRAM, AND AMENDING THE FY 2005-2006 ANNUAL BUDGET IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $25,848.00.
|
|
Adopted |
The resolution was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members
Campbell, Golonski, Ramos and
Vander Borght.
Noes: Council Members None.
Absent: Council Members None.
|
|
201
Hurricane Katrina
Relief Update |
Interim Fire Chief
Pansini reported that at the
November 8, 2005
meeting, Council Member Golonski requested an update on local assistance
efforts to aid the victims of hurricanes in the Gulf States Region. He
reported that hurricanes Katrina and Rita wreaked havoc in the early Fall
of 2005 causing significant human, infrastructure and economic impacts.
He noted that recovery efforts will continue for years, and the associated
costs will amount to billions of dollars.
Chief Pansini
reported that on
September 13, 2005,
Council Member Golonski requested an assessment of the possibility of the
City assisting with some type of relief effort that would be directed
towards the victims of Hurricane Katrina. He noted that this report was
being presented as the first step in the two-step agenda process for
discussion and additional Council direction only. He added that the
decision made by the Council as a result of this report will determine
future fiscal impacts.
Staff was directed
to return with a report on the cost associated with the City participating
as a facilitator in conjunction with Habitat for Humanity.
|
|
209
Waiver of
Attorney-Client
Privilege regarding Planning Board
Member
Humfreville |
Mr. Barlow, City
Attorney, reported that at the request of the Council, the City Attorney�s
Office prepared a legal opinion memorandum regarding the possible conflict
of interest of Planning Board Member Dan Humfreville relative to his
participation in Project No. 2005-50, Conditional Use Permit and Variance
for Andre de Montesquiou, California Chicken Caf�. He noted that the
memorandum is a confidential attorney-client privileged document and
requested Council direction on whether or not to waive the attorney-client
privilege and publicly release the memorandum.
|
|
Motion |
Following Council deliberation, it was moved by Mr. Golonski, seconded by
Mrs. Ramos and carried that �the confidential memorandum be released to
the public.�
|
|
Motion |
It was moved by Mr.
Vander Borght, seconded by Mr. Campbell and carried that �the matter be
put back on a future agenda to provide for a response from Mr. Humfreville.�
|
|
Final Open
Public Comment
Period of Oral
Communications |
There was no
response to the Mayor�s invitation for speakers for the final open public
comment period of oral communications at this time.
|
|
Adjournment |
There being no
further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at
11:19 p.m. to Wednesday, November 30, 2005 for a meeting with Los Angeles
County Supervisor Antonovich at 7:30 a.m., Buena Vista Library, 300 North
Buena Vista Street, Burbank, to discuss the following items: Flood
Control Support/Cooperation; Los Angeles County Fire Department Aid; Storm
Water Management; Household Hazardous Waste; Transportation; County Fee
Related Budget Impacts; and, Bridge Inspection Services.
Margarita Campos, CMC
City Clerk
|
|
|
|
