Ms. Alvord, City
Manager, introduced the item and stated that in addition to looking at how
best to collectively do business, staff looked at best practices on a
global scale. She stated that when staff�s goal is achieved, higher cost
reductions will be realized.
Mr. Flad, Assistant
City Manager, noted the changes in the Joint Ventures Matrix format and
stated that the document will be updated as progress is made. He added
that staff would be reporting on six items and that additional direction
will be required on items relative to labor negotiations issues. He noted
that not all joint ventures with the Burbank Unified School District (BUSD)
are on the Matrix and that there are other pending items that staff is
still working on in an effort to realize further savings.
Dr. Kiafar,
Chief Facilities and Development Superintendent, reported that installing
solar heating panels for the high school swimming pools would create
savings for the BUSD and the community at large. He stated that BUSD
staff conducted a preliminary analysis with regard to
the cost and
timeline for the projects and thereafter held discussions with City staff,
which yielded positive feedback. He added that staff then submitted a
report to the Board of Education (Board) and received support for the
projects. He also stated that a formal request for approval is on the
Board�s next agenda to authorize proceeding with the projects. He
informed the Council and Board that the Burbank High School project would
be completed in the Summer at a cost of $170,000 and that the estimated
cost for the John Burroughs High School project was $210,000. He noted
that once the two projects are completed, a significant amount of savings
in energy usage and utility consumption will be realized.
Mrs. Lackey
requested further clarification on the difference in costs between the two
projects. Dr. Kiafar responded that some of the preliminary work for the
Burbank
High School
pool had been previously completed, and that the location of the solar
panels and the distance between the panels and the swimming pool makes a
significant difference in the costs.
Mr. Krekorian also
requested clarification with regard to the anticipated payback period for
the improvement and life expectancy of the solar panels. Dr. Kiafar
responded that based on the information from the consultant used by the
City for the
McCambridge Park pool, the payback period was approximately three to five
years. However, he noted that there are many other factors that could
affect energy conservation such as the usage of a pool blanket, length of
time of the pool is in operation and the temperature at which the pool is
set. In terms of energy consumption, he stated that savings of between 52
and 70 percent would be realized and that the solar panels� life
expectancy is estimated at 15 to 20 years.
Mr. Golonski
inquired as to whether the Gas Company had been approached about
participating in the projects. Dr Kiafar responded that staff contacted
Savings by Design, an agency funded by the Gas Company, which provides
rebates and funding for energy saving measures, for participation and that
a meeting has been scheduled on the matter. Mr. Golonski suggested that
staff contact the City�s local Gas Company representative regarding this
matter.
Mr. Campbell also
suggested that staff contact BP Solar which has a program that provides
low cost solar products.
Mrs. Cohen, Library
Services Director, reported that the City submitted an application for a
State grant to construct a new Central Library and staff anticipated a
response in August or September. She added that part of the application
included the partnership between the BUSD and the City. She noted that
the partnership which has evolved from this process has been very
positive, and displayed a list of textbooks received by the Library from
the BUSD to serve as reference copies at the Central Library for the
students. She also reported that last year, Library staff participated in
the BUSD�s kindergarten round-ups at which the Library�s programs were
explained to the students.
Mrs. Cohen also
stated that staff continues to work on ways in which to realize further
savings through joint purchasing of library books and materials. She also
announced an upcoming Friends of the Library book sale, prior to which
school librarians are permitted to take up to five books free of charge
with other books provided at a very low cost. She also stated that staff
will continue to work with Dr. Sheehy, Director of Secondary Education, to
provide information on scholarships and financial funding for students who
might not otherwise have considered going to college due to financial
constraints.
Ms. Burton,
Superintendent�s Office Assistant, presented a brief background on the
Hazard Mitigation Plan, which mandates compliance by all local
governments, agencies and special districts by
November 1, 2004.
She explained that although not a law, non-compliance would render any
agency ineligible for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funds
should a disaster occur after that date. She added that due to the
complexity and fast approaching deadline, staff determined that a
consultant was necessary to develop the plan. She noted that since the
BUSD and City will need similar information, staff proposed that the plan
be developed as a joint venture.
Mr. Baenen,
Community Disaster Coordinator, reiterated the need for a consultant since
both agencies will need similar information and stated that
Los Angeles
County strongly suggested that school districts work in conjunction with
City governments.
Mr. Vander Borght
inquired as to the anticipated costs and as to whether a consultant was
already retained. Ms. Burton responded that staff met with the Area C
Consortium and that five of the nine cities will be utilizing the
consultant that the City is considering. She added that the proposal will
be presented for the Board�s approval on
Thursday, April 1,
2004, and that the consultant guaranteed that the plan will be completed
by September 2004 so that State approval can be secured prior to
submission to the Federal government. Mr. Baenen added that the City
already approved an amount of not to exceed $60,000 at the Mid-Year Budget
Review.
Mrs. Lackey
commented on the collaborative relationship on this project and expressed
support for FEMA�s prospect of looking at mitigation funds prior to
disaster occurrence to allow for preparation before a disaster strikes.
Mr. Kemp inquired as
to whether FEMA will provide funds in advance to mitigate potential
disaster flaws. Mr. Baenen clarified that the agencies will determine
their priorities and, once funding is available, agencies will be in a
better position to fund their top priorities.
Mr. Golonski
recounted a past joint venture in which the City provided funds for
disaster supplies and requested that the item be added to the Joint
Ventures Matrix.
Mr. Campbell
requested further clarification on the application of Senate Bill 352 and
Ms. Burton responded that the Bill does not apply to existing facilities
or properties but noted that the BUSD is in compliance thus far.
Mr. Baenen also
added that public meetings on the matter will be scheduled to solicit
input.
Mr. Davis, General
Manager, Burbank Water and Power, reported that the item on sales
of energy saving kits to families through initiative was completed.
With regard to the expanded use of reclaimed water supplies, he stated
that the Council approved a Reclaimed Water Master Plan and that funding
for the Plan and staff is available. He also reported that approval of a
matching grant in the amount of $95,000 for solar
heating of BUSD high school pools will be presented for
Council approval on
April 13, 2004. Concerning renegotiation of the Utility Rate Agreement,
he stated that staff was facing challenges in determining baselines given
the on-going construction, but added that the Agreement will be presented
for approval once the proposals have been discussed with BUSD staff.
Mr. Golonski
requested an update on a proposal discussed at the last joint meeting for
a less formal process in developing a baseline to help each school site
measure energy consumption. Mr. Davis requested that the proposal be
discussed with BUSD staff prior to being presented to the Council.
Mr. Golonski also
commended BWP staff for the implementation the Compact Fluorescent Light (CFL)
fundraising program. He requested that staff present a report on the
program�s performance. Mr. Davis informed the Council and Board that staff
was considering several conservation programs that will be presented at a
future date.
Discussion ensued on
the CFL fundraising program.
Mr. Golonski noted
an email on a proposal regarding reviewing the landscape water usage in
municipalities to avoid waste and suggested that staff review the
feasibility of water rate subsidies as an incentive for water
conservation. Mr. Davis noted that the landscaping waste average in the
City is about 40 percent and that staff has developed a comprehensive
conservation proposal that will address electricity, waste water,
reclaimed water, gas, refuse, etc. Dr. Kiafar also added that BUSD staff
is in the process of preparing a report on the matter for presentation to
the Board.
Mr. Vander Borght
noted that the Board had a wish-list of projects distributed at a prior
joint meeting with an item regarding installation of a computerized
irrigation system for the schools and fields.
Mr. Golonski
commented on a joint recycling collaboration between the schools and the
Public Works Department and requested that staff provide an update on the
matter at a future meeting.
Mr. Vander Borght
noted that staff requested additional direction on several items that
would involve labor negotiations. He recognized the challenges associated
with labor negotiations and cautioned that such issues be approached with
care since they pertain to individual livelihoods and may potentially
involve the possibility of job losses. He expressed support for attaining
savings without loss of jobs and suggested postponing the items while
discussions on the matter continue.
Following Council
and Board deliberation, Ms. Murphy suggested that staff present a report
on any potential problems, especially given the different bargaining
units. She also noted the need for the bargaining units to be involved in
the process from the start.
Mr. Krekorian
suggested that respective staff provide separate detailed reports on each
item and that the issues be considered jointly after both bodies have
considered the facts separately.
It was the Council
and Board consensus that staff begin with Items Number 8, co-locating
warehousing operations, and 17, review of negotiated agreements that would
permit common repairs of vehicles, maintenance of grounds etc.
|