An adjourned meeting of the Council of the City of Burbank was held in the
Council Chamber of the City Hall, 275 East Olive Avenue, on the above date.
The meeting was called to order at 6:09 p.m. by Ms. Murphy, Mayor.
Present- |
Council Members Campbell, Golonski, Ramos, Vander Borght and Murphy. |
Absent - - - - |
Council Members None. |
Also Present - |
Ms. Alvord, City Manager; Mr. Barlow, City Attorney; and, Mrs. Campos,
City Clerk.
|
Budget Study
Session
|
|
City Attorney |
Mr. Barlow, City Attorney, presented the proposed budget reductions for
the City Attorney�s office.
|
City Council/City
Manager |
Ms. Alvord, City Manager, presented the proposed budget reductions for the
City Council and City Manager�s offices.
|
Public Information
Office |
Mr. McManus, Public Information Officer, elaborated on the proposed budget
reductions for the Public Information Office.
|
Golden State
Subordinated
Debt |
Mr. Hanway,
Financial Services Director, reported this item was agendized following
Council Member Golonski�s request for information regarding the ability of
the Redevelopment Agency (Agency) to pay the $25 million subordinated debt
owed to the General Fund. He provided a brief background on the debt
agreement and the alternatives available, and stated in 1993 the City
loaned $25 million to the Agency in the form of a subordinated taxable
debt obligation for the construction of the new Police/Fire facility and
that the Agency was paying interest to the City with the entire principal
amount due in 2043, a 50-year debt obligation. He added the current
interest revenues decreased dramatically prompting a review on how to
proceed with the debt. He also noted the desperate need for capital outlay
projects such as the construction of the Development and Community
Services Building (DCSB).
Mr. Hanway then
discussed three available options which included: 1) maintaining status
quo; 2) remarketing with a subordinated debt issuance; 3) scheduling
annual repayment plans on the principal as can be afforded by the Golden
State Project Area.
He presented pros
and cons on each option, stated staff recommended the remarketing of the
debt and noted, although the entire $25 million would not be received due
to the costs of issuance, the option would provide the highest net-present
value and allow the City to receive the funds immediately, and lock in the
debt so that the ultimate repayment term would continue to 2043 thereby
fixing the interest rate and guarding against market risk. On the con
side, he stated the General Fund would lose the annual interest payments
of approximately $750,000 and the interest rate, though fixed, would be
higher than the current rate.
Regarding Option
Three, he noted the unknown impacts from the State�s budget process that
would impact the Golden State Project Area�s ability to make the payment,
though the payments from this approach would be considered as recurring
revenue for the General Fund. He also noted this approach provided the
lowest net-present value analysis of the three options, the least amount
of money to low and moderate-income housing funds, reduced the tax
increment available for other obligations, and reduced the interest paid
to the General Fund since the principal would be paid down.
He informed the Council, based on the City�s need for capital outlay
projects, Option Two would allow for the construction of the DCSB, and
maximize recurring General Fund dollars.
The Council noted and filed the report
|
ERP Project
Summary |
Ms. Wyatt, Information Technology Director, presented an update on the
Oracle Project. She reported in the late 1990s, the City undertook an
information strategic planning effort by the Warner Group which included
recommendations for infrastructure upgrades, creation of the Information
Technology Department, the different staffing levels, and replacement of
the Legacy information systems to make them more effective. Specifically,
recommendations were made to replace and upgrade the financial systems,
the human resources and payroll systems, budgeting and accounting systems
to be Year-2000 (Y2K) compliant, and that the City selected the Oracle
suite of applications and implemented the financial portion of that suite
in 1999. She noted coupled with lack of business engineering efforts and
training for the new users, the new system provided several challenges to
the users and that the Information Technology Department brought in
consultants to stabilize the system but never fully installed the other
components of the suite. She added further challenges still existed with
the different departments especially Burbank Water and Power, and that the
lifecycle of the product would be coming to an end since Oracle 107 would
no longer have technical support as of June 2003.
She noted the need to upgrade to the next product, and reported the needs
assessment process approved by the Council last fall had been completed
successfully. She stated interviews were held with all departments to
ensure their needs were identified, and that the needs assessment
conducted by Oracle Corporation identified several issues including:
set-up issues, inaccurate and incomplete implementation set-up;
insufficient training; limited technical resources; unimplemented
reporting strategy; outdated business practices; and evolving business
requirements that needed to be addressed.
Ms. Wyatt informed the Council staff recommended implementing the new
financial system, Oracle 11I, in Fiscal Year 2003-04; developing and
adopting a training model; reengineering the City�s business processes to
leverage the technology; and delivering software as a service through the
Application Service Provider (ASP) model. She explained this would
require finding a new service provider specialized for these services as
opposed to the City hiring more technical staff to develop and support
these projects; extending the base of Oracle 11I to include human
resources and payroll operations; and, expanding the operational systems.
She explained the option to upgrade rather than re-implement was also
considered and that though upgrading would cost less, staff was
recommending re-implementation, noting the flaws in the initial
implementation process would hamper the performance of the upgrade
process. She further clarified staff recommended a phased approach for
Oracle 11I migration in Phase One, human resources and payroll
applications in Phase Two-A, work management applications in Phase Two-B;
and budgeting and analysis applications in Phase Three.
Ms. Wyatt then discussed the fiscal impact associated with the
implementation process and stated a survey with several vendors also
resulted in comparable costs. She informed the Council of a proposal
received from Automated Data Processing (ADP) to perform the payroll
functions, at an amount less than the current cost.
The Council received the report.
|
Governor�s May
Revision |
Mr. Hanway, Financial Services Director, reported on the Governor�s May
Revision to the proposed State budget and stated the proposed City budget
did not take into account any effects that would result from the State�s
budget process. He stated the most onerous impact of the Governor�s May
Revision was the proposal to shift $250 million from redevelopment
agencies to pay the State�s obligation to the Educational Revenue
Augmentation Fund (ERAF) with the possibility of increasing the amount by
approximately 50 percent in the future. He stated redevelopment was one
of the few economic arms possessed by cities and is a critical resource.
He also stated the Governor�s January proposal included eliminating the
$15.8 million Public Library Fund (PLF) budget and that the May Revision
was proposing a $14.8 million cut in this fund, leaving only $1 million.
He explained this would result in a total of approximately $2,800 to the
City, as opposed to the $92,000 current PLF budget. He also noted an
additional $12,772 in booking fees was proposed for elimination and that
State mandates have been suspended, with several being repealed. He also
informed the Council the Vehicle Licensing Fees (VLF) would be restored to
the pre-1998 level but noted there could be a 60 to 90-day gap between the
flow of associated revenues. He also mentioned the State allocated some
sales tax revenues to the Transportation Fund to meet prior obligations.
The Council received the report.
|
Changes to
FY 2002-03
General Fund
|
Mr. Hanway informed the Council the balance for the Fiscal Year (FY)
2002-03 was initially projected at $197,000 but noted with consideration
of the Cable Franchise renewal and the Supplemental Employee Retirement
Plans (SERP), the balance would now be $71,000. He stated the recurring
issues directly impacting the FY 2003-04 budget included: the declining
Transient Parking Tax (TPT) revenues, declining Utility Users Tax
revenues, reduction in Interest Revenues, and increase in the Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) Education Reimbursement Fund. He also reported the
Police Department renegotiated their computer maintenance contracts for a
savings of $22,000, noted the PerformArt grants that were already awarded
but needed one-time funding in the amount of $39,000, and added a savings
of $91,000 was realized as a result of the April Consumer Price Index
(CPI) with regard to the Burbank Police Officers Association�s (BPOA) MOU
negotiations. He concluded, currently, the FY 2003-04 budget proposed
using $1.2 million from the Burbank Water and Power Set-Aside Fund.
The Council received the report.
|
Fee Schedule
Review Discussion |
Mr. Hanway requested
the Council discuss the items on their wish-list and the proposed Fee
Schedule and direct staff as desired.
Mr. Vander Borght
requested clarification on the impact of not increasing the Transient
Parking Tax. Mr. Hanway responded General Fund revenues would be reduced
by $400,000 as opposed to $100,000 if the TPT was not increased by the
proposed two percent.
Mr. Golonski
requested a hearing be scheduled to discuss the potential TPT increase
from 10 percent to 12 percent. The Council concurred that the hearing be
scheduled.
Mr. Golonski
requested the Council discuss the proposed fee charges for admission to
the swimming pools, noting he was not supportive of raising resident fees
but would support raising the non-resident fee.
Ms. Murphy inquired
if staff surveyed other municipalities for their pool fees and Mr. Flad,
Park, Recreation and Community Services Director, stated a survey was done
which indicated that Burbank�s proposed fees would be ranked in the
middle, noting that staff would ensure youth rates were kept as low as
possible. He informed the Council the City based all fees on an
affordability model and not a cost recovery or competitiveness model and
that fees were always generally lower than what other municipalities
charged. Ms. Murphy requested the survey results be provided to the
Council.
Mrs. Ramos noted the
potential increase of non-resident users following the closure of other
cities� pools and requested staff consider raising non-resident fees.
Ms. Alvord recounted
the large number of non-resident users following the 1994 earthquake when
the cities of Los Angeles and Glendale shut down their pools.
Ms. Murphy requested
staff provide a report illustrating the fiscal impact of not raising the
fee for residents aged 12 and under, and raising the fee for residents
aged 13 to 18 by fifty cents.
Ms. Murphy stated it
appeared that the Council Members were comfortable with the fees as
proposed at this time.
|
Budget Overflow
Items
Personnel Reductions
|
Mr. Hanway requested
the Council discuss the Budget Overflow Items on the Council�s wish-list.
Regarding personnel
reductions, Mr. Golonski noted the difficulty of implementing employee
lay-offs but noted it was a step that had to be done, considering the
following fiscal years� forecasts were worse than this year�s.
Mr. Vander Borght
requested the Council consider postponing employee lay-offs for a
six-month period and fund those positions with a one-time allocation to
provide a reasonable amount of time for the affected employees to make
adjustments and seek other opportunities.
Mr. Golonski
concurred and requested one-time funding for retraining programs to help
the subject employees in the transition and asked Mr. Nicoll, Management
Services Director, to provide a report with regard to the cost of such
program.
Mrs. Ramos inquired
as to the legal implications for retaining employees for the six-month
period and Mr. Nicoll responded all employees scheduled for lay-offs were
provided with services of a job-resume service, a financial advisor paid
for by the City, and job transition counseling through the job outreach
service. He informed the Council the retirement offer was statutorily set
and that the employees had a 28-day review period of the agreement, an
additional 7-day right of recision, and a total of 30 days advance notice
set by the Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs). He noted other implications
included morale and their ability to work, following the lay-off notice.
He also clarified only two employees were scheduled for lay-off without
SERP offers, since they were not of retirement age.
Ms. Murphy
acknowledged the concern regarding morale, but stated compared to the
ability for the employees to meet their daily obligations, she was in
favor of Mr. Vander Borght�s request for a six-month extension period.
Mr. Campbell
supported the six-month extension but noted the adverse financial status
of the City in the following fiscal years.
|
City Clerk�s Training Budget
|
Regarding the
training budget reductions in the City Clerk�s office, Ms. Murphy noted
the critical need for training for staff to keep up-to-date with frequent
changes in the law, especially with the recent close scrutiny of the
election process. She requested Council support to keep the City Clerk�s
training budget intact. Mrs. Ramos and Mr. Vander Borght concurred.
|
Northwest Library
Hours |
Mr. Golonski
requested funding be provided to keep the Northwest Library open on
Saturday and Tuesday nights. He noted the area was already underserved
and that students would need to complete their homework during weekdays.
He suggested the possibility of using one-time funds to address this need.
Ms. Murphy inquired
as to the number of users at the Northwest Library and Mrs. Cohen, Library
Services Director, responded the Northwest Library served a population of
approximately 30,000 people, the average circulation on a Tuesday night or
Saturday was approximately 300 items as compared to the Buena Vista
Library with 1500 to 1800 items, and that there was only a small
percentage of individuals who had expressed the lack of transportation to
pick up items from other libraries. Ms. Murphy also noted the
availability of the Got Wheels! Program to transport students to and from
the different libraries. Mrs. Cohen also added the non-resident use at
the Northwest Library on weekends was approximately 60 to 70 percent as
opposed to 40 percent during weekdays. Ms. Murphy was supportive of the
Library closing on Tuesday nights and Saturdays.
Mr. Vander Borght,
Mrs. Ramos and Mr. Campbell concurred.
|
Planning Board Meals |
Mr. Golonski
requested the Planning Board meals be restored. Ms. Murphy, Mr. Vander
Borght and Mrs. Ramos concurred.
|
Year Round Lap
Swimming |
Mr. Golonski
requested the Year-Round Lap Swimming program be maintained and suggested
increasing the fees to help defray the costs, and to advertise the
availability of the program to increase participation.
Mr. Flad, Park,
Recreation and Community Services Director, noted the significant drop-off
in revenues from the program and that the users had already voiced concern
that the current fees were high. He affirmed the fee increase would by no
means off-set the costs associated with the program and noted the average
number of participants was five people per day with more staff on any
given day than the pool users.
Ms. Murphy was not
supportive of funding the program with the low number of users considering
the cost for maintaining the program. The Council concurred.
Staff was directed
to work with the Burbank Unified School District in an effort to subsidize
the Excel Swim Program.
|
PAY Grants
Program
|
Mr. Golonski
acknowledged the value of Positive Alternatives for Youth (PAY) Grants
over the years but stated he supported the proposed cuts.
Mrs. Ramos stated
she was not supportive of the cuts but suggested lowering the funding
amount and keeping funding available for alternative youth programs that
met the goals they were set for.
Mr. Golonski
indicated support of Mrs. Ramos� comments to reduce the funding amounts,
but recognized many of these programs were initially pilot programs which
had turned into recurring expenses and suggested a phase-out process as
opposed to eliminating programs at once.
Ms. Murphy also
supported a reduction in funding, and a phase-out approach.
Mr. Golonski
suggested funding half the cost of the program out of a one-time fund as a
phase-out approach. Ms. Murphy and Mrs. Ramos concurred.
|
PerformArt Grants
Program
|
The Council agreed
to fund the proposal to pay the PerformArt grants which were awarded in
January 2003 but would actually be disbursed in Fiscal Year 2003-04.
Mr. Golonski noted
the need for the program and requested staff bring back the item for
reconsideration in December before next year�s awards, for a possible
phase-out funding approach as was awarded to the PAY Grants program.
|
Fund 534 Projects
|
Mr. Golonski
expressed support for staff�s proposal. The Council concurred.
|
Speed Bumps |
Discussion ensued
regarding speed bumps and other traffic mitigation measures. Mr. Feng,
Public Works Director, informed the Council there was sufficient funding
to install speed bumps for all requests so far submitted to the Public
Works Department, and that $25,000 pertaining to the speed bump program
would be eliminated from next year�s budget.
|
Paramedic Training
|
Mr. Golonski
affirmed the need for having more paramedic- trained fire fighters and
stated he was not supportive of eliminating the training program.
Following Council
deliberation the Council agreed to eliminate funding for the program in
Fiscal Year 2003-04 as a short-term solution and that the item needed to
be earmarked for funding for future fiscal years.
|
Final Decision Making |
Mr. Hanway,
Financial Services Director, stated pursuant to Council direction
regarding the wish-list items, the total General Fund deficit was now
$1,338,363 to be off-set by the Burbank Water and Power Set-Aside Fund.
Mr. Golonski noted
the Mayor�s Youth Task Force would be presenting a request for Council
approval to fund a violence prevention program at the high school level.
Mr. Hanway provided
the Council with a schedule of future budget study sessions and noted June
10, 2003 as the hearing date for the proposed budget and the fee
resolution.
|
Adjournment |
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting
was adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
s/Margarita Campos
Margarita Campos, City Clerk
|
APPROVED JULY 15, 2003
s/Stacey Murphy
Mayor of the Council
of the
City of Burbank
|