A
regular meeting of the Council of the City of Burbank was held in the Council
Chamber of the City Hall, 275 East Olive Avenue, on the above date. The
meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mr. Laurell, Mayor.
CLOSED SESSION
Present- |
Council Members Golonski, Murphy, Ramos (arrived at 5:09 p.m.), Vander
Borght (arrived at 5:03 p.m.) and Laurell. |
Absent - - - - |
Council Members None. |
Also Present - |
Ms. Alvord, City Manager; Mr. Barlow, City Attorney; and, Mrs. Campos,
City Clerk.
|
Oral
Communications |
Mayor Laurell called for oral communications on Closed Session matters at
this time.
|
Citizen
Comment |
Appearing to comment were
Howard Rothenbach,
commenting on the Airport Authority�s B-6 Property closed session item
scheduled for Thursday, April 24, 2003, inquiring whether the Council will
be discussing this same item, noting the Airport Authority�s agenda
referenced the National Guard Armory and requesting to know who the City
is negotiating with regarding this item and what the general subject of
the lease was; Mike Nolan, reading from the Airport Authority�s agenda
regarding the B-6 site closed session item, including the instructions to
the negotiator, expressing anger at his inability to obtain information
regarding closed session items listed on the City Council closed session
agenda in the past, commenting that the description of the item was
insufficient, and inquiring if the Council had discussed the relocation
of the National Guard Armory; and Marie Paino, commenting that the City
should consider constructing five single-family residences in place of the
former Buena Vista Branch Library.
|
5:10 P.M.
Recess |
The Council recessed at this time to the City Hall Basement Lunch
Room/Conference Room to hold a Closed Session on the following:
|
|
a. Conference with Real Property Negotiator:
Pursuant to Govt. Code �54956.8
Agency Negotiator: Ron Davis, General Manager, Burbank
Water and Power.
Property:
3900 West Alameda Avenue.
Party With Whom City is Negotiating: West Alameda Avenue
Property,
LLC.
Terms Under Negotiation:
Renewal of rooftop
communications lease.
|
|
b. Conference with Legal Counsel � Anticipated Litigation (City
as possible plaintiff):
Pursuant to Govt. Code �54956.9(c)
Number of potential case(s): 1
|
|
c. Conference with Legal Counsel � Anticipated Litigation (City
as potential defendant):
Pursuant to Govt. Code �54956.9(b)(1)
Number of potential case(s): 2
|
Regular Meeting
Reconvened in
Council Chambers |
The regular meeting of the Council of the City of Burbank was reconvened
at 6:32 p.m. by Mr. Laurell, Mayor.
|
Invocation
|
The invocation was given by Father Rafael Minassian, Armenian Catholic
Church.
|
Flag Salute
ROLL CALL |
The pledge of allegiance to the flag was led by Elizabeth Coleman, Burbank
Youth Board Member.
|
Present- |
Council Members Golonski, Murphy, Ramos, Vander Borght and Laurell. |
Absent - - - - |
Council Members None. |
Also Present - |
Ms. Alvord, City Manager; Mr. Barlow, City Attorney; and, Mrs. Campos,
City Clerk.
|
301-1
Pack for
Success |
Mrs. Stein, Deputy
Director of Recreation and Youth Services, Park, Recreation and Community
Services Department, stated she served as a liaison to the Burbank Youth
Board. She introduced three members from the Burbank Youth Board;
Elisabeth Coleman,
Monterey High
School; Selin Petrosian, John Muir Middle School, and Jenna Wilcox at
large member of the Burbank Youth Board. Ms. Wilcox made brief remarks
about the Youth Board in general, noting their goal to perform community
service projects, and introduced the Pack for Success Project, aimed at
filling 40 backpacks with school supplies to be distributed to at-risk
youth in the community.
|
301-1
Earth Day |
Mayor Laurell
invited Public Works Director Bruce Feng to the podium to accept a
proclamation in honor of Earth Day.
|
301-1
Armenian
Genocide
Recognition |
Mr. Martin,
representative from the Armenian National Committee, expressed
appreciation to the City for the opportunity to commemorate the Armenian
Genocide of 1915, gave a brief overview of the endeavors of the Armenian
community in the
United States and
requested the government of
Turkey
accept responsibility for the genocide. He then invited Mr. Sam Kadorian,
survivor of the Armenian Genocide, Army Veteran for the World War II, and
Shunt Jarchafjian, member of the Armenian Youth Federation of Burbank, who
recently was on a hunger strike to protest the lack of commemoration of
the Armenian genocide at the Museum of Tolerance, to accept the
proclamation. Mayor Laurell presented them with a proclamation in honor of
Armenian Remembrance Day.
|
7:00 P.M.
Continued Hearing
1702
PD 2000-5
Platt Project
|
Mayor Laurell stated
that �this is the time and place for the continued public hearing on
Planned Development No. 2000-5 and the related Development Agreement. The
site of the proposed project is the property bounded by
Alameda Street, Lima
Street, Olive Avenue, and property adjacent to the 134 Freeway off-ramp.
On
April 15, 2003, the
Council opened the public hearing, heard testimony and received evidence
from staff and the City�s environmental consultants, the Applicant�s
representatives, and members of the public. The Council conducted
deliberations and directed the City Attorney�s Office to prepare
appropriate resolutions pertaining to the certification of the EIR and
denial of the Project.�
|
Staff
Report |
Mr. Garcia,
Assistant City Attorney, stated pursuant to Council direction at the
April 15,
2003 Council meeting, staff was presenting two proposed resolutions for
Council consideration, pertaining to the certification of the
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and the denial of the Platt Project. He
added the EIR concluded that all significant impacts of the proposed
project would be mitigated to below significance with the exception of air
quality impacts during construction. If certified, any future project
proposal would be based on the EIR and an addendum, supplemental or
subsequent EIR could be prepared dependent upon the nature of the changes
to the project. He concluded staff recommended certification of the EIR
and informed the Council correspondence was received from the attorney
representing the M. David Paul project, and added the period for comments
on the EIR and project was closed and as such the Council was not legally
required to consider further correspondence, and that no issues were
raised in these pieces of correspondence that have not been addressed on
this matter.
With regard to
project denial, Mr. Garcia stated staff submitted to the Council a
proposed resolution with an alternate resolution denying the project and
waiving the Planned Development application fees for future project
proposals.
Mr. Vander Borght
inquired whether it was possible to certify only certain components of the
EIR and Mr. Garcia clarified the preference to certify the EIR in its
entirety or not at all.
Mayor Laurell stated
one card had been turned in for public comment but the period for public
comment on the matter was closed. Mr. Barlow stated if the public comment
period was reopened, then the item would have to be re-noticed and
continued to another date to allow everyone another opportunity for
comment.
Mr. Golonski
requested staff to address the adequacy of the traffic component in the
EIR, noting the letter from a Planning Board Member stating the analysis
did not include the cumulative effect of planned projects already approved
and the immediate neighborhood to the north of
Alameda Avenue.
Mr. Herman,
Transportation Division Manager, stated the entitled projects and the
studios� Master Plans were included in the EIR�s traffic study, and that a
regional assumption of traffic growth from outside the City and
anticipated forecast until 2008 was used. He noted the challenge of
developing a traffic study model to achieve the desired objectives while
including residential streets and that proposed turn signals would address
traffic issues on the residential streets.
Mr. Loccaciado,
Principal of Impact Sciences, also added a robust methodology was used in
the cumulative traffic impacts and that over 30 projects were considered
from the cities of
Burbank, Glendale
and Los Angeles.
Mr. Barlow cautioned
if the Council decided to deny the project but request further study on
the EIR before certification, the study would not be based on any existing
project.
Following
deliberation, the Council decided to not certify the EIR.
|
Motion |
It was moved by Mr. Vander Borght and seconded by Ms. Murphy that "the EIR
not be certified.�
|
Carried |
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members
Murphy, Ramos, and Vander Borght.
Noes: Council Members Golonski and Laurell.
Absent: Council Members None.
|
Motion |
It was moved by Mr. Laurell and seconded by Ms. Murphy that �the following
resolution be passed and adopted:�
|
1702
Deny PD 2000-5
w/DR 2000-19
(Platt Project) |
RESOLUTION NO. 26,463:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK DENYING PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT NO. 2000-5, WITH DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2000-19, AND THE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATED THERETO.
|
Adopted |
The resolution was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members
Golonski, Murphy, Ramos, Vander
Borght and Laurell.
Noes: Council Members None.
Absent: Council Members None.
|
406
Airport Authority
Report |
Commissioner Wiggins
reported on the Airport Authority�s meeting of April 21, 2003, stating in
addition to minutes, six action items were considered, including: the
approval of the airfield security enhancement project and award of a
contract in the amount $96,000 to EC Construction; endorsing a statement
of principles for a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the
California Air Resources Board, the Air Quality Management District and
the 17 signatory airlines to reduce emissions from their ground support
equipment by 80 percent by the year 2010; approval of a take-back from
United Airlines of four ticket counter spaces and reassigning them to Sky
West Airlines who will operate as United Express using Canada Air regional
jets with the weekly number of flights changing from 61 to 76 beginning in
May; approval of a lease with the Transportation Security Administration
for 3500 square feet for the next five years; and award of a contract for
$129,000 for phase one of Desmond Studio�s project comprised of a new
entrance on Cohasset Street, sewage and utility infrastructure.
The Council received
the report.
|
8:02 P.M.
Hearing
1702
ZTA 2002-1
(Shopping Center/Retail
Uses in the
Airport Zone)
|
Mayor Laurell stated that �this is the time and place for the hearing on
Zone Text Amendment No. 2002-1 and a negative declaration related
thereto. The zone text amendment establishes a shopping center use and
allows that use in all zones which presently allow retail uses.
Additionally, shopping centers will be allowed in the Airport zone as a
conditional use. This zone text amendment also establishes a �power
center� use and allows it in all zones where retail is a permitted use.
This use is not allowed in the Airport zone.�
|
Notice
Given |
The City Clerk was asked if notices had been given as required by law.
She replied in the affirmative and advised that no written communications
had been received.
|
Staff
Report |
Mr. Forbes, Senior Planner, stated staff was requesting approval for a
Zone Text Amendment (ZTA) to create two new zoning use categories in
Chapter 31 of the Burbank Municipal Code (BMC) for shopping centers and
power centers, with both uses being permitted by-right in most commercial
zones. Shopping centers would be permitted in the Airport Zone subject to
approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) with power centers prohibited
in the Airport Zones.
With a visual aid, Mr. Forbes identified the airport zoned properties in
the City, noting the only privately owned parcel was at the corner of
Vineland Avenue and Sherman Way which was the impetus for the ZTA. He
stated the ZTA was applied for by the property owner in conjunction with
an application to redevelop the site with a multi-tenant commercial
shopping center, to change retail uses from prohibited to conditionally
permitted in the Airport Zone. He added the applicant also applied for a
CUP which would be required for the shopping center, should the Council
approve the ZTA and that rather than undertake a comprehensive review of
the zoning use list to determine which specific use categories should be
conditionally permitted, staff recommended that a new use category of
shopping center be created. He also stated staff recognized the potential
impact of the proposed amendment on undeveloped portions of the airport
zone along Hollywood Way, and the potential for a big-box retail
development on the Trust Property in the event the property is sold for
non airport use. He noted due to the proximity to the Airport and airport
generated traffic in the area now and in the future, staff believed that a
regional commercial power center may not be an appropriate use for the
Trust Property thereby recommending the creation of a separate power
center zoning use category, defined as a shopping center with a total
floor area of 200,000 gross square feet or more, or any single tenant with
a gross area of 60,000 square feet or more. These power centers would be
permitted in commercial zones throughout the City where shopping centers
would be permitted, but prohibited in the Airport Zone.
Mr. Forbes added the Planning Board held a public hearing to consider the
redevelopment of the site in November 2002 and approved all aspects of the
CUP as proposed and creation of the shopping center zoning use category
but noted the consideration did not include the power center use, an
aspect staff considered subsequent to the Planning Board�s consideration
of this matter. He informed the Council following the Planning Board�s
review, the proposed ZTA was also reviewed by the Los Angeles County
Airport Land Use Commission (Commission) as it would affect land that is
located within the airport planning area as defined in the Los Angeles
County Airport Land Use Plan (Plan). A public hearing was held in March
2003 by the Commission, and received unanimous approval and determination
that the ZTA was consistent with the Plan. The proposed ZTA would not have
any impact on any other zones other than the Airport Zone since shopping
centers and power centers are already permitted by-right in most
commercial zones in the City. He also added the ZTA was consistent with
the purpose and intent of the Airport Zone and all goals and policies of
the City�s General Plan and that the nine finding Code requirements could
be made for the proposed amendment.
|
Applicant |
Mr. Pribyl, Architect, representing the applicant, requested Council
approval of the ZTA.
|
Citizen
Comment |
Appearing to comment was
David Piroli, in
opposition to the power center restriction on the Airport Trust Property,
referencing traffic jams during shift changes at the time Lockheed was in
business, citing bottleneck traffic problems caused as a result of the
relocation of Costco Wholesale Corporation, suggesting a restriction that
a power center on the Trust Property must ingress and egress from Vineland
Avenue to keep the traffic from being dumped on Hollywood Way and further
congest airport traffic.
|
|
Mr. Forbes responded
to Mr. Piroli�s comments regarding access noting the subject property was
land-locked and that
Hollywood Way was
the only means for access.
|
Hearing
Closed |
There being no further response to the Mayor�s invitation for oral
comment, the hearing was declared closed.
|
|
Mr. Golonski
requested clarification between shopping and power centers, and the need
for adding power center to by-right uses in commercial zones other than
the Airport. Mr. Forbes responded a power center was a form of shopping
center with the distinction being the size thresholds, that the various
commercial and retail uses were permitted by-right with no size thresholds
and that the ZTA would create a cap.
|
Ordinance
Introduced and
Resolution
Adopted |
It was moved by Mr. Vander Borght and seconded by Ms. Murphy that "the
following ordinance be introduced and read for the first time by title
only and passed to the second reading and the following resolution be
passed and adopted:�
|
1702
ZTA 2002-1
(Shopping Center/Retail
Uses in
Airport Zone
|
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK AMENDING CHAPTER 31 OF
THE BURBANK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO SHOPPING CENTERS. (ZONE TEXT
AMENDMENT NO. 2002-1). |
1702
Adopt Neg. Dec.
For ZTA 2002-1
|
RESOLUTION NO. 26,464:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK ADOPTING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION (ZTA NO. 2002-1). |
Adopted |
The ordinance was introduced and the resolution was adopted by the
following vote:
Ayes: Council Members
Golonski, Murphy, Ramos, Vander
Borght and Laurell.
Noes: Council Members None.
Absent: Council Members None.
|
Reporting on
Closed Session |
Mr. Barlow reported on the items considered by the City Council during the
Closed Session meeting.
|
First Period of
Oral
Communications |
Mr. Laurell called for speakers for the first period of oral
communications at this time.
|
Citizen
Comment |
Appearing to comment were
Garen Yegparian,
expressing appreciation for the Armenian Remembrance proclamation, and in
opposition to using Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds
obtained for capital projects to fund staff positions, stating he finds
such use unethical; Sue Boegh, requesting CDBG funding and support of the
Goals Committee and staff regarding funding the Summer Youth Employment
Program; Esther Espinoza, on award of City contracts, the recent
appointment of City Manager Alvord; Ken Hoaglund, expressing appreciation
to the Council for not approving the Burbank Media Center Project (Platt);
and Bill Augustyn, Director of Operations for BUILD Rehabilitation
Industries, requesting Council support of their CDBG grant application.
|
Staff
Response |
Members of the Council and staff responded to questions raised.
|
Second Period
of Oral
Communications |
Mr. Laurell called for speakers for the second period of oral
communications at this time.
|
Citizen
Comment |
Appearing to comment were
Garen Yegparian,
continuing his comments in opposition to using CDBG funding to fund Code
Enforcement activities, addressing future uses of South San Fernando Park,
suggesting maximizing open space use, preferring a soccer field or
basketball court, requesting restrooms be accessed from the inside during
the day when school is in session and from the outside at other hours,
requesting shade trees be used along the border and in the courtyard area;
Rachel Galperin, Executive Director of the Burbank Center for the
Retarded, expressing appreciation for the City�s support during the past
several years of CDBG funding, requesting support of their request for
$20,000 to be used for staff salaries; Laurie Bleick, Director at Family
Service Agency, a counseling and educational service in the community for
50 years, requesting support of their CDBG grant application, discussing
their programs in detail; George Saikali, General Director of Burbank
YMCA, discussing the components of the YMCA proposal, including Summer
Camp on Catalina Island, childcare, and youth and senior fitness needs,
requesting Council support of their CDBG grant application; Alex Fey,
expressing appreciation to the Goals Committee and staff for CDBG
allocation for the Burbank Boys and Girls Club, describing the proposed
projects in detail, including the expansion of their after-school program
to Miller Elementary School.
Esther Espinoza, in
opposition to funding the Ota Student Exchange Program, commenting on the
CDBG Consolidated Plan; Bill Augustyn, on the benefits of the CDBG grant
proposal noting the need for product diversity requiring newer technology
and training; Captain Gary Smith, Salvation Army, in support of their
request for CDBG funding, and describing the programs which the funding
will be used for; Mike Nolan, in opposition to the Council funding the Ota
Student Exchange Program, especially during this time of fiscal austerity,
noting the money to fund the chaperones was included in the Library�s
budget, expressing concern over Burbank students traveling to Asia during
the SARS outbreak; David Piroli, inquiring what the food services facility
is for South San Fernando Park, requesting more than 41 parking spaces be
provided, supporting additional soccer fields and basketball courts, in
opposition to a fabric shade structure as opposed to a more durable shade
structure; Dr. David Gordon, congratulating the newly-elected Council
Members, commenting on improvements in Magnolia Park and expressing
concerns with traffic congestion in the Magnolia Park area; and Howard
Rothenbach, commenting on the temporary use of Trust Property for Sunrise
Ford and the lack of a Public Utility Commission (PUC) 21661 hearing, and
commenting on the lack of information given on closed session items.
|
Staff
Response |
Members of the Council and staff responded to questions raised.
|
804-3
2003-08
Consolidated Plan |
Mr. Yoshinaga,
Grants Coordinator, stated in Fiscal Year (FY) 2002-03, the City would
submit a five-year consolidated plan as a regulatory requirement that
encompasses applications for federal entitlements including Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home
Investment Partnerships Act (HOME)
funds. He added the consolidated plan was a strategy to address the City�s
housing and community development needs especially low and moderate-income
households, predicated on current data, the 2000 United States Census, the
City�s current housing element and profile and other demographic
information from the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) and Los Angeles County.
He stated some of
the issues identified in the community included overcrowding in rental
units, increase in rent, lack of specialized needs for senior citizens and
persons with disabilities, need for emergency shelter and services for the
homeless, increasing need for youth services, recreation facilities,
shortage of childcare facilities, increase in demand for job training and
employment placement, affordable housing, rehabilitation of existing
housing and infrastructure improvements. He noted the strategic plan
detailed priorities and programs to deal with these issues and further
reflected the Federal, State/local and private resources and programs that
were available to meet identified needs, as well as an annual action plan
indicating which resources and programs would be used in FY 2003-04 to
accomplish specific, quantitative goals.
He added the Annual Plan included new
Federal funding available this year and other resources to address
strategic plan goals and that of the four entitlement grants covered by
the Plan, Burbank was eligible and applied for CDBG and HOME program
funds, estimated at approximately $2.6 million for FY 2002-03. He noted a
CDBG Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use
of Funds, as approved by the Council, would program over $1.7 million in
CDBG activities, while HOME funds ($904,000) would finance housing
projects. He informed the Council the Annual Plan and federal applications
must be submitted to HUD no later than May 15, 2003 for the upcoming year.
Compared with last year,
Mr. Yoshinaga stated the CDBG entitlement represented over a six percent
increase, total program funds were $195,700 more than FY 2002-03 or 12.6
percent higher, and that the FY 2003-04 HOME funds were $161,000 more than
FY 2002-03 or over 21 percent higher. He added the Community Development
Department planed to use all HOME funds for acquisition and rehabilitation
projects targeted for focused neighborhoods, and that the projects would
be contracted with the Burbank Housing Corporation, a Community Housing
Development Organization (CHDO), and would be submitted for Council
approval. He noted a total of 21 requests covering 35 projects/activities
and $2.7 million were received, including 17 capital projects for $2.3
million and 18 public service projects totaling over $421,000.
He also stated on
January 14,
2003, the
Council approved the capital projects as recommended by the Executive Team
with the exception that the
Providencia
Elementary School proposal be funded with the prior year�s CDBG funds;
however, based on new CDBG information
effective September
1, 2003,
Providencia
Elementary
School was no
longer eligible.
Mr. Yoshinaga
informed the Council based on the FY 2003-04 CDBG, capital funds were
$59,348 more than originally estimated in November 2002 with an additional
$540,000 in unprogrammed and unspent funds from prior years, making total
capital funds equal $1,671,198. As a result of this new funding
availability, the recommendations of the Executive Team and the Community
Development Goals Committee were revised to allow an increase in public
service projects, with recommendations that the Salvation Army, BUILD
Rehabilitation, Burbank Temporary Aid Center, the Boys and Girls Club,
Burbank Center for the Retarded, Literacy Program, and Partners in Care be
funded at the same level as last fiscal year. He added the Committee also
recommended new or increased funding for the following organizations:
Family Service; Summer Youth Employment Program; YMCA; 2004 Noon Lions and
Adult Day Health Care Center. Both Committees recommended the proposal by
the Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley ($18,000) be funded with
CDBG Program Administration funds at the 20 percent statutory maximum or
$348,061.
|
Motion |
It was moved by Mr. Golonski and seconded by Ms. Murphy that �the
Executive Staff recommendations be passed.�
|
Carried |
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members
Golonski, Murphy, Ramos, Vander
Borght and Laurell.
Noes: Council Members None.
Absent: Council Members None.
|
|
Mrs. Ramos requested
she recuse herself from voting on the approval of funds for program
services as she was a Board member for one of the agencies.
|
9:46 P.M.
Mrs. Ramos
Left the Meeting |
Mrs. Ramos left the meeting at this time.
|
Public Service
Projects |
Mr. Golonski stated
the recommendations requested status quo, with exceptions of a $10,000
increase in funds for the Summer Youth Employment, new $10,000 funding for
the Adult Day Health Care Center, and additional funding for Noon Lions
and Family Service Agency. He indicated support for funding the programs
but expressed concern about the lack of detail in the Noon Lions
application. Mrs. Alvord suggested the allocation be held until further
details are provided.
|
Motion |
It was moved by Ms. Murphy and seconded by Mr. Golonski that �the
following resolution be passed and adopted:�
|
804-3
Consolidated Plan for 2003-04 |
RESOLUTION NO. 26,465:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK AUTHORIZING THE
APPROVAL AND SUBMISSION OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS
2003-2004 INCLUDING APPLICATIONS FOR FEDERAL FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR
2003-2004, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOME INVESTMENT
PARTNERSHIPS ACT (HOME) PROGRAMS AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF RELATED
AGREEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS.
|
Adopted |
The resolution was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members
Golonski, Murphy, Vander Borght
and Laurell.
Noes: Council Members None.
Absent: Council Member Ramos.
|
9:53 P.M.
Recess |
The Council recessed at this time. The meeting reconvened at 10:09 p.m.
with all members present.
|
Motion |
It was moved by Ms. Murphy and seconded by Mrs. Ramos that "the following
items on the consent calendar be approved as recommended.�
|
Minutes
Approved |
The minutes for the regular meetings of January 28 and February 4, 2003
were approved as submitted.
|
1208-6
Renewal of
Rooftop
Communications
Lease |
RESOLUTION NO. 26,466:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK APPROVING THE RENEWAL
OF THE ROOFTOP COMMUNICATIONS LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURBANK AND WEST
ALAMEDA AVENUE PROPERTY LLC.
|
1005
Burbank Employees� Retiree Medical
Trust |
RESOLUTION NO. 26,467:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK AUTHORIZING THE CITY
TREASURER TO ESTABLISH AN ACCOUNT AT THE BURBANK CITY EMPLOYEES� FEDERAL
CREDIT UNION FOR THE CITY OF BURBANK EMPLOYEES� RETIREE MEDICAL TRUST.
|
204-3
204-4
General and
Special Election
Results |
RESOLUTION NO. 26,468:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK DECLARING THE RESULTS
OF THE CONSOLIDATED GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION AND SPECIAL ELECTIONS HELD
ON APRIL 8, 2003.
|
701
801-2
Library Staff
Education
Program |
RESOLUTION NO. 26,469:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK AMENDING THE FISCAL
YEAR 2002-2003 BUDGET FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECEIVING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS
AWARDED FOR THE PUBLIC LIBRARY STAFF EDUCATION PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF
$3,186.
|
1702
AMC Pledge to
Extend $150,000
Annual Donation
Two More Years |
RESOLUTION NO. 26,470:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK ACCEPTING A PLEDGE TO
DONATE MONEY BY AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INC. AND APPROVING AN AGREEMENT
RELATED THERETO.
|
907
801-1
Inmate Telephones |
RESOLUTION NO. 26,471:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK AMENDING FISCAL YEAR
2002-2003 BUDGET FOR THE PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATING REVENUE FUNDS RECEIVED
FROM THE CITY�S INMATE PAY TELEPHONE PROVIDER FOR ITEMS THAT WILL BENEFIT
THE INMATES IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000.
|
1506
Rehab. Of BWP
Reservoir No. 2 |
RESOLUTION NO. 26,472:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK APPROVING AN AMENDMENT
TO THE CONTRACT FOR THE INTERNAL REHABILITATION OF RESERVOIR NO. 2 BETWEEN
THE CITY OF BURBANK AND THE HOWARD RIDLEY COMPANY (QUOTATION NO.
2002-062).
|
Adopted |
The consent calendar was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members
Golonski, Murphy, Ramos, Vander
Borght (except Resolution No. 26,468) and Laurell.
Noes: Council Members None.
Absent: Council Members None.
Abstain: Council Member Vander Borght (Resolution No.
26,468).
|
305-4
Sister City
Program |
Mrs. Cohen, Interim
Library Services Director, stated this item was agendized at Mrs. Ramos�
request, for Council consideration to use the unappropriated Close-Up
Program funds of $10,000 to send
Burbank students on
the summer 2003 Burbank Sister City Student Exchange with Ota City,
Japan.
She recounted the
first student exchange between Burbank and Ota City occurred in 1984, when
Burbank entertained a group of Japanese students and that since that time,
students from each city have exchanged visits on alternate years with
Summer 2003 being the tenth out-bound group of Burbank students to travel
to Ota City and the twentieth year of the exchange program.
She informed the
Council the student exchange selection process was open to all
high-school-age Burbank residents and consisted of a written application
signed by the student and parents, copies of grade reports, letters of
recommendation, and an oral interview of the student, with the parents
separately interviewed to verify unconditional willingness to continue in
the program and to participate as a host family the following year. She
added two chaperones accompany the selected out-bound students on each
visit and that chaperones have historically been teachers, school
administrators, and well-known community members. Further, she stated the
Burbank
program did not cover the expense of the airfare to Japan which must be
paid by the exchange student, and that any fundraising activities by the
students prior to the trip were credited toward the airfare.
Mrs. Cohen stated
each year the Council allocates $20,000 in the budget to send
Burbank students to
Washington, D.C. as part of the Close-Up Program. In Fiscal Year (FY)
2001-02 no students were sent on this trip due to safety concerns
following the World Trade Center attack on
September 11, 2001
and as a result, the $20,000 was carried over to this fiscal year. She
added at the
January 14, 2003 Council meeting, the Council allocated $30,000 from the
$40,000 to the Close-Up Program with $10,000 remaining in unappropriated
funds.
Council Member Ramos
requested the Council consider allocating the remaining $10,000 to the
Sister City Committee to fund airfare for 12 students and added the
chaperones� airfare was purchased from the Library Services expense
account budgeted for that purpose. While acknowledging the pending budget
crisis, Mrs. Ramos noted the Exchange Program provided an opportunity to
educate future international ambassadors, and expressed the desire that
this program be available to all students in the community and not be
limited to only those who had the economic ability to participate.
Ms. Murphy agreed it
was an important program but expressed concern that this funding has not
been available in the past and will probably not be available in the
future, especially with the imminent budget crisis.
Mr. Vander Borght
suggested the money be used over a period of several years rather than as
a windfall to the students traveling in summer 2003.
Staff was directed
to return with a detailed report on how the Sister City Committee proposed
to spend the funds within the criteria proposed by the Council.
|
1108
1102
412
Jt. Mtg.
w/Redev. Agency
S. San Fernando
Park/School/
Community
Center Project &
S. San Fernando
Streetscape
Project |
Mr. Clifford,
Capital Projects Manager, stated the purpose of the staff report was to
request Council acceptance of the Architectural Program for the South San
Fernando Project (Project) Phase One and to request approval to move
forward with the Schematic Design Phase subject to any recommendations by
the Park, Recreation and Community Services Board, City Council, and the
Burbank Board of Education; and to provide an update to the Redevelopment
Agency Board on the Design Development Phase of the South San Fernando
Boulevard Streetscape Project (SSF1). He stated on August 30, 2002, the
Council directed staff to proceed with the site demolition, design and
preconstruction services for the Project including: a 16,000 square foot (sf)
joint use facility to address the need for the Burbank Youth Recreation
Program and serve as a permanent home for a community school, a children�s
play area, a basketball court, open space, picnic area, and on-site
surface parking for at least 16 spaces. He added a community stakeholder�s
design workshop in three neighborhoods was held to provide guidance and
ensure that the Project met the recreational needs of the local
neighborhood to the greatest extent possible. He noted the City�s
commitment to pursue a minimum silver rating under the Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design Standard (LEEDS) criteria, to represent
the first green building within City limits.
Mr. Wolff, Wolff
Lang Christopher, gave a PowerPoint presentation outlining the planning
process and noted the architectural programming that allowed for 41
parking spaces under the building footprint, adding a parking study would
be undertaken to ensure that the projections met the parking needs of the
facility. He described the different rooms which included: a 200-person
capacity multi-purpose room, a dance/aerobics facility, several flex
program spaces for a variety of different functions, a computer
laboratory, administrative space for the City, storage and a central lobby
on both stories. He also described the landscape architectural design that
allowed for the creation of a tot-lot, basketball court, a park, open and
picnic area spaces.
Mr. Clifford
outlined the future scheduling milestones of the Project including;
completion of the schematic design phase in Late July 2003; design
development in October 2003; submitting 90 percent complete plans to the
Department of State Architect in March 2004; construction documents to be
completed in July 2004; commencement of construction in September 2004;
completion construction in July 2005 and building occupancy and park
opening in August 2005. With regard to the fiscal impact, Mr. Clifford
stated there was no fiscal impact as a result of Council approval, and
that sufficient funding was available.
Ms. Davidson-Guerra,
stated at the conclusion of the schematic design phase, the Streetscape
Project was presented to the Council and that the project had now moved
into the design development phase and all information necessary to proceed
to the next level of design had been collected. She added at the community
meetings held jointly for the park and school projects, three primary
issues concerning vehicular traffic, street crossings and safe pedestrian
access to the park, were raised and affirmed that all these concerns could
be mitigated through the design process. She added the Streetscape Project
met the goals and objectives of the South San Fernando Redevelopment Plan
in terms of enhancing the aesthetics of the corridor as well as creating
an environment conducive to economic growth and development and also
provided a transitional character of the corridor, more sensitive to the
adjacent residential neighborhoods. She informed the Council the project
had been well received by the community and requested the Council approve
the architectural program for the South San Fernando Park, School and
Community Center and direct staff to proceed with a schematic design phase
subject to any recommendations by the Council and School Board and that
the Redevelopment Agency would appoint the Park and School Oversight
Committee to also serve as the oversight committee for the South San
Fernando Streetscape project.
|
Motion |
It was moved by Ms. Murphy and seconded by Mr. Golonski that the �Council
accept the Architectural Program for the South San Fernando Project Phase
1 and approve to move forward with the Schematic Design Phase subject to
any recommendations by the Park, Recreation and Community Services Board,
City Council, and the Burbank Board of Education for the Community
Park/School Project, and appoint the South San Fernando Community
Park/School Oversight Committee to serve as the Oversight Committee for
the South San Fernando Boulevard Streetscape Project.�
|
1301-3
Magnolia Park
Street Imp.
(B.S. 1136) |
Ms. Teaford, Chief
Assistant Public Works Director, requested approval of a construction
contract for phase four of the Magnolia Park Street Improvement Project to
create additional angled parking on City streets. She stated the first
three phases of the project were constructed in 1999 and 2000, and in
November 2001 the Magnolia Park Citizens Advisory Committee requested
additional funds for additional improvements in the area over a five-year
period. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2002-03 the Council authorized allocation of
$125,000 to widen
Avon Street
and Lima Street north of Magnolia Boulevard, to accommodate angled
parking. She noted angled parking would provide a visual narrowing of the
street at its entrance and create a traffic calming measure. She denoted
six additional parking spaces would be created, four on Avon Street and
two on Lima Street, and stated Tyna Paving Company submitted the lowest
bid in the amount of $68,062.61 for this phase, with work anticipated to
begin in late May or June 2003 and be completed in 42 calendar days.
|
Motion |
It was moved by Mr. Golonski and seconded by Ms. Murphy that �the
following resolution be passed and adopted:�
|
1301-3
Magnolia Park
Street Imp.
(B.S. 1136) |
RESOLUTION NO. 26,473:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK APPROVING AND ADOPTING
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETERMINING THE LOWEST
RESPONSIBLE BIDDER, ACCEPTING THE BID, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A
CONTRACT FOR MAGNOLIA PARK STREET IMPROVEMENTS � PHASE 4, BID SCHEDULE NO.
1136.
|
Adopted |
The resolution was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members
Golonski, Murphy, Ramos, Vander
Borght and Laurell.
Noes: Council Members None.
Absent: Council Members None.
|
704
1108
PSA w/Jones
Lang Lasalle for
Pre-Construction
Svcs. For DeBell
Clubhouse
Replacement
Proj. and S. San
Fernando Proj. |
Mr. Clifford, Capital Projects Manager, requested Council approval for a
Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) to
provide pre-construction services for the DeBell Clubhouse Replacement
Project and the South San Fernando Project, Phase I (SSP-1). He stated the
Steering Committees for both projects recommended retaining one
pre-construction service provider to augment staff for each of these
important projects. He added staff sent out a Request for Proposal (RFP)
in July 2002 to seven firms with five firms submitting cost proposals on
February 18, 2003, for review by the Pre-Construction Service Provider
Selection Committee. He added the Committee selected the top three
qualified firms for oral presentations on March 13, 2003 and unanimously
decided to retain JLL. He noted the projects recently completed by JLL and
stated JLL was considered an integral part of the Project Team
representing the City�s overall best interest, and would provide technical
expertise in establishing project controls that would enable these
projects to be completed on time, on budget, and consistent with project
objectives.
He added a Not-to-Exceed Fee (Fee) of $182,500 was negotiated for the
pre-construction services described above and was more specifically
detailed in the PSA. He noted the Fee represented one and one-half percent
of the $12,000,000 total estimated and combined value of both projects,
and was within the industry-accepted range and norm of one to two percent
for professional services of this nature. Regarding fiscal impact, he
stated the Consultant�s Fee would be equally divided between both projects
at $91,250 each and that sufficient funds were available from each
project.
Mr. Vander Borght inquired if staff considered providing the services
in-house and Mr. Feng replied using in-house staff would pose a possible
conflict and stated his preference for an independent party to evaluate
the City�s cash flow and project management.
|
Motion |
It was moved by Mr. Vander Borght and seconded by Ms. Murphy that �the
following resolution be passed and adopted:�
|
704
1108
PSA w/Jones
Lang Lasalle for
Pre-Construction
Svcs. For DeBell
Clubhouse
Replacement
Proj. and S. San
Fernando Proj. |
RESOLUTION NO. 26,474:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK APPROVING A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURBANK AND JONES LANG
LASALLE FOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE DEBELL CLUBHOUSE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT AND THE SOUTH SAN FERNANDO PROJECT, PHASE I.
|
Adopted |
The resolution was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members
Golonski, Murphy, Ramos, Vander
Borght and Laurell.
Noes: Council Members None.
Absent: Council Members None.
|
406
2nd Amend. To
Grant of
Easements for
Sunrise Ford. |
Ms. Riley, Sr.
Assistant City Attorney, presented a request by the
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority (Authority) to enter into a
second amendment to the Trust Property Easements to permit the temporary
use of approximately three acres for the storage of cars by Sunrise Ford.
She recounted in 1999 the City and the Authority entered into several
agreements arising out of the Authority�s condemnation of the B-6 Site and
subsequent City lawsuits. She explained the B-6 Site was divided into the
Adjacent Property and Trust Property, and stated one of the Trust Property
agreements entailed limitations on the uses on the Trust Property and
prohibited any airport expansion. She advised in order to allow Sunrise
Ford to lease any of the site on the Trust Property even on a temporary
basis, the City and the Authority would need to amend this agreement to
allow Sunrise Ford to store new cars on part of the M-2 Zoned area.
She informed the
Council Sunrise operates a car dealership at
5500 Lankershim
Boulevard in
North Hollywood and that the term of the proposed amendment would be for a
maximum of two years, with the access to the site through two separate
gates at Tulare Avenue and San Fernando Road. She noted improvements
proposed by Sunrise Ford included additional lighting, fencing, payphone
installation, and that there was a provision in the agreement that these
improvements would be removed at the end of the term. She added the M-2
Zoning allowed automobile storage yards and clarified the Public Utilities
Code requirements.
Mr. Brown, Sunrise
Ford General Manager, affirmed the temporary use of the Trust Property
pending relocation to their permanent site located in
Burbank.
|
Motion |
It was moved by Mr. Golonski and seconded by Mrs. Ramos that �the
following resolution be passed and adopted:�
|
406
2nd Amend. To
Grant of
Easements for
Sunrise Ford.
|
RESOLUTION NO. 26,475:
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK APPROVING A SECOND
AMENDMENT TO THE �GRANT OF EASEMENTS, DECLARATION OF USE RESTRICTIONS AND
AGREEMENT FOR TRUST PROPERTY� TO PERMIT TEMPORARY USE OF APPROXIMATELY
130,680 SQUARE FEET OF THE M-2 ZONED PORTION OF THE TRUST PROPERTY FOR USE
BY SUNRISE FORD, INC. (BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA AIRPORT AUTHORITY,
APPLICANT).
|
Adopted |
The resolution was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members
Golonski, Murphy, Ramos, Vander
Borght and Laurell.
Noes: Council Members None.
Absent: Council Members None.
|
11:21 P.M.
Reconvene Redev.
Agency Meeting |
The Redevelopment Agency meeting was reconvened at this time.
|
Third Period of
Oral
Communication
|
Mr. Laurell called for speakers for the third period of oral
communications at this time.
|
Citizen
Comment |
Appearing to comment were
Mark Barton,
commenting on the Wayfinding Signage Program proposed for downtown Burbank
and potential cost reductions; David Piroli, on the number of people in
attendance at last week�s Council meeting due to the Platt Project
hearing, requesting a contingency plan for overflow crowds at future
Council meetings; Eden Rosen, in opposition to sending students to Japan
at the present time due to SARS outbreak and animosity towards the United
States by North Korea, on upcoming workers compensation regulation
amendments, and requesting a status report on the Methodfest event; and
Mike Nolan, commenting on negotiations with Sunrise Ford moving into the
Zero site, reading again from the Airport Authority closed session agenda
with regard to the B-6 Property, commenting on the public�s lack of
knowledge on the joint National Guard Armory negotiations between the
cities of Burbank and Glendale and on the negotiations with Sunrise Ford.
|
Staff
Response
|
Members of the Council and staff responded to questions raised. |
Adjournment |
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting
was adjourned at 11:39 p.m.
____________________________ s/Margarita Campos
Margarita Campos, City Clerk
|
APPROVED
JUNE 17, 2003
s/Stacey Murphy
Mayor of the
Council
of the City of
Burbank
|